Skip to main content

Noble simplicity and the Advent Wreath

Some are put away, because the great excess and multitude of them hath so increased in these latter days, that the burden of them was intolerable - from 'Of Ceremonies, why some be abolished, and some retained'.

Pray Tell has a good piece on the Advent Wreath by Episcopal priest and Nashotah House assistant professor of Liturgics and Pastoral Theology Matthew S. C. Olver.  I confess to having something of the zeal of the convert on this matter.  Once a fan of the Advent Wreath, experience in the parish has increasingly convinced me that it can become a hindrance to the meaningful observance of Advent.

Referring to the various themes associated with each of the candles, Olver states:

The principal problem with these themes is they bare only a slight relationships to the lectionary readings and collects for the day and thus serve only to clutter the liturgy, not enrich its celebration. Furthermore, many of the narrative “explanations” are not very well written and the prayers are forgettable. With three lessons, a psalm, and a collect already (not to mention the minor propers, for those who use them), still more prayers and readings are accretions that we should take care to avoid.

So what should be done about this "fetishizing (is that too strong a word?) of the Advent wreath as something somehow intrinsic to the season".  Olver points to a 2005 article by Bruce Russell in a Prayer Book Society of Canada publication, encouraging a "focus and tendency toward simplicity":

Our challenge is to find ways to integrate this observance within the spirit and form of Anglican traditional liturgy while avoiding the trite language and clichéd typologies of many of the rites that are in circulation. Often the simplest solution is the most appropriate in Liturgy, allowing signs and gestures to speak for themselves. Once again the Book of Common Prayer can accommodate thoughtful innovation that respects and compliments its integrity. 

Perhaps the "simplest solution" is have the respective candle of the Advent Wreath lit without liturgical ceremony.  It is not as if the various meanings attached to the candles are deeply embedded in liturgical tradition: Russell shows quite clearly that the liturgical use of the Wreath is a 20th century devotion.  It can have value as a means of marking the four Sundays of Advent and the culmination of the season in the celebration of the Nativity of our Lord, while the use of greenery instead of flowers is an Advent custom. 

Crowding other meanings on top of this, however, risks disordering the Advent liturgy, introducing a 'thematic' observance of the Sundays of Advent which does not cohere with either traditional or contemporary lectionaries.  For example, this Second Sunday in Advent the Gospel reading in the contemporary lectionary is Like 3:1-6, on the witness of St John the Baptist, the theme of the lighting of the Wreath on the Third Sunday in Advent.

In other words, the Advent Wreath should be - to use words from the title of Olver's piece - on the periphery of the Advent liturgy, certainly not at its centre.  The use of greenery and light in Advent can be meaningful in itself, not requiring liturgical ceremony.  In fact, the significance of greenery and light in Advent can be overshadowed by the addition of the thematic approach and accompanying ceremony.

This seems to be "within the spirit and form of traditional Anglican liturgy".  As Liam Beadle said in a recent Faith and Worship article:

There is, in the Book of Common Prayer, a careful rejection of that which which is fiddly or ambiguous ... here we find ... a dignified restraint, a noble simplicity.

Such noble simplicity helps to ensure that the traditional focus of Advent is not overlaid and obscured by ceremonies and devotions which are not oriented towards "the last day, when he shall come again in his glorious Majesty".

Comments

  1. Advent wreaths are a striking way to mark time. That's it. While the symbolism of growing light is there, there's also the sense of an hourglass about it, that one is running out of time. Used to be that Advent was marked with black hangings, and Dies Irae was originally an Advent sequence. Add evergreens and the blood red of holly berries, etc. and there's quite a striking image. White or red candles for the Advent wreath finishes the imagery, both festive and challenging. Also, if one simply must light the candles during the liturgy, light them at the collect in some way, either just before or just after, with the appropriate silence. The collects (and introits, if you want) give us the meanings of the Sundays, not some churched up equivalents of a greeting card company!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Entirely agree. Less can be more. The "greeting card" approach really does distract from the traditional, great Advent focus.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...