Skip to main content

On the Sunday next before Easter: beginning the week of the Paschal Mystery

What are we to make of the absence of the term 'Palm Sunday' from the BCP 1662?  Is it another sign of an impoverished liturgical provision for Holy Week?

The Young Tractarians - linking to the entry for Palm Sunday in the Catholic Encylopedia - have highlighted that rather than being a rejection of liturgical tradition, the BCP here retrieves an earlier tradition which the liturgy of the Palms too easily overshadowed (my analysis, not that of the Young Tractarians!).  In the words of the entry:

In the three oldest Roman Sacramentaries no mention is found of either the benediction of the palms or the procession. The earliest notice is in the "Gregorianum" used in France in the ninth and tenth centuries. In it is found among the prayers of the day one that pronounces a blessing on the bearers of the palms but not on the palms. The name Dominica in palmis, De passione Domini occurs in the "Gelasianum", but only as a superscription and Probst ("Sacramentarien und Ordines", Münster, 1892, 202) is probably correct in suspecting the first part to be an addition, and the De passione Domini the original inscription. It seems certain that the bearing of palms during services was the earlier practice, then came the procession, and later the benediction of the palms. 

That this Sunday was originally De passione Domini is seen in, for example, Leo the Great's Sermon 54, delivered on the Sunday before Easter.  It contains no mentions of palms, but from its opening has an unrelenting focus on the Passion:

Among all the works of God's mercy, dearly-beloved, which from the beginning have been bestowed upon men's salvation, none is more wondrous, and none more sublime, than that Christ was crucified for the world.

Leo also refers to the defining characteristic of the Sunday - not palms and procession, but the reading of the Passion:

But because, dearly-beloved, the whole story is too long to go through today, let us put off the rest till Wednesday, when the reading of the Lord's Passion will be repeated.

And this, of course, is what we see in the BCP 1662 provision for this Sunday, with the Passion according to St Matthew being the appointed Gospel reading.  Rather than being an impoverishment, it is a retrieval of the venerable, older tradition of proclaiming the Lord's Passion on this Sunday.

Which brings us to the title given to the Sunday in 1662 - 'The Sunday next before Easter'.  This is actually a richer title than the rather functional 'Palm Sunday', as it orients us towards the fullness of the Paschal Mystery, what Leo in his sermon for the Sunday calls "the mystery of His Death and Resurrection".

Put simply, 'Palm Sunday' fails entirely to draw this into focus. It fails to declare that this is the Sunday which begins the week of the Lord's Passion.  The absence from the Prayer Book tradition of Palm Sunday and the liturgy of the Palms, then, is no impoverishment but an enrichment, ensuring that the Church enters into this week gazing without distraction upon the mystery of the Cross.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more