"Omitted in our kalendar": Cosin on why the Prayer Book does not observe the Assumption

Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Omitted in our kalendar, because there had been so many fabulous and superstitious stories devised about it in the Roman Church, where they now observe this day with more festival solemnity than they do the Ascension of Christ Himself. But they have no certain ground for their feast; for, first, how long the blessed Virgin Mary lived, and at what time or place she died, no account can be given out of the holy Scriptures, which say nothing either concerning the time of her nativity, or the day and manner of her death. Nor is there, secondly, any mention made hereof in all the writings of the ancient fathers during the first five ages of the Christian Church. But in after times there rose up a generation of men, who, being not content with the former silence of Scripture and antiquity herein, fell to surmise and make many stories about it of their own heads, fancying to themselves rather what they would have bad done, than what was truly and really done in this matter ...

The truth is, that the story of her assumption, now so much celebrated and generally believed in the Roman Church, is grounded only upon uncertain fables, first devised by men that gave their minds to vanity and superstition; of which kind the world never wanted store ...

And for this consideration it was, that the Church of England did by public authority abrogate this feast of the blessed Virgin's Assumption, whose soul nevertheless we believe to be assumed in paradise, there expecting the resurrection of her body (which was the choicest vessel of God's grace that ever the world had among all His saints) for the consummation of her endless felicity.

John Cosin, 'On the Kalendar' in Notes on the Book of Common Prayer, Works, Volume V.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog