Skip to main content

Christological confession and "an old English custom"

... an old English custom.

Thus did a Canadian cleric in 1866 refer to the practice of turning East during the saying or singing of the Creed.  Such a description may explain the hostility towards the practice, outside of the expected neo-Puritan circles.  After all, a custom particular to the post-Reformation ecclesia Anglicana sits very uncomfortably with those who desired Anglican liturgical revision to meekly conform to bland post-Vatican II Roman norms. 

That the practice is, however, rooted within how the Common Prayer tradition of the ecclesia AnglicanaRichard Mant's 1820 Notes on the BCP quote both Thomas Bisse (d.1731) and Archbishop Secker defending turning East during the Creed.  Bisse describes the practice as "proper and significant", while Secker notes of it "many do".  Similarly, John Jebb in his 1843 The Choral Service of the United Church of England and Ireland: Being an Enquiry into the Liturgical System of the Cathedral and Collegiate Foundations of the Anglican Communion states:

The custom of turning to the East during the Creed, immemorial in many parish Churches, in the country especially, and universal in Cathedrals and Colleges ...

Interestingly, both Bisse (as quoted by Mant) and Jebb refer to the practice as turning "to the Altar or the East".  In other words, there is no embarrassment regarding the practice being understood as directed towards the altar.  We turn East, says Jebb, "at to the place where the Dayspring from on high visited us" (emphasis added).  To turn East, then, is to affirm that the central confessions of the Apostles' and Nicene creeds - the Lord's Incarnation, Passion, and Resurrection - happened in time and in history, for they happened in a particular place.

In turning East, however, we also then turn towards the altar.  Mant quotes Clutterbuck (from his 1712 work on the Prayer Book): "In that part also the holy table or altar is placed".  For Jebb, the practice is thus intimately connected with the Eucharist:

We turn to the Altar, to express more strongly our Faith in Christ, whose death is there specially commemorated, and whence those holy elements are dispensed, which are peculiar means of grace, to refresh our souls, and to strengthen our faith. 

Here, too, the Christological confession at the heart of the Creeds is rooted and grounded in place and time, for at the Holy Table are heard the words "Who, in the same night that he was betrayed ... my Body which is given for you ... my Blood of the New Testament, which is shed for you".

The practice, then, is a sign of the Church's Christological faith not as myth or metaphor of God Incarnate, but of God becoming Incarnate in that place and time, there and then dying and rising.  It is a practice embodying Apostolic, Nicene Faith, that in a place and at a time, witnesses could say of the Eternal Word, Very God of very God, "which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled".

We should be grateful for this "old English custom" and its place in the Anglican tradition.  Its very particularity speaks of the reality of the Incarnation for, in the words of John Milbank, a church that is "disincarnate" - aloof and apart from place and culture - "is not really the religion of the Incarnation at all".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...