Skip to main content

Against an overly angelic anthropology: the Convocation Book, natural law, and the commonwealth

Speaking of "the High Church divines ... from Andrewes to Gibson", G.W.O. Addleshaw in his classic The High Church Tradition (1941) points to the Convocation Book (1606) - the work of the Convocation of the Church of England, addressing 'the Government of God's Holy Catholic Church, and the Kingdoms of the Whole World' - as "the most useful exposition of their views" on the ecclesiastical and civil polities.  The extract below (Book II.ii) grounds the civil polity in natural law and the Augustinian-Thomist insistence that grace does not destroy nature, an insistence shared by Hooker when he declares "that grace hath use of nature" (LEP III.8.6).  This vision of the commonwealth has significance in both delivering the Church and the Christian proclamation from, in the words of John Hughes, "an overly angelic anthropology" and in rightly ordering common life in the polity towards the Good and the True.

It is a certain rule in Divinity, that Grace doth not destroy Nature. The Doctrine of the Seed of the Woman, that was foretold should break the Serpents head, did not abolish the Moral Law. The Ceremonies in the Old Testament, which shadowed and signified the mercies of God in Christ, had no power to extinguish the Laws, first imprinted in men's hearts; and afterward ingraven in Tables of stone by the Finger of God. The Prophets foretelling the coming of Christ, and the merits of his Passion, did likewise reprove all sins and offences committed against the Ten Commandments. Christ testifieth of himself, that he came not to destroy the Law and the Prophets, but to fullfil them. By his Death he hath delivered us from the Curse of the Law; but not from the obedience of it. And St. Paul saith, that the Apostles did not make the Law of none effect through Faith but they did thereby establish the Law.  For that Faith doth only apprehend Christ truly to Salvation, which worketh by Charity; that is, which purgeth the Conscience from dead works, to serve the living God; and bringeth forth by the Spirit, Obedience to the Precepts and Laws of God. 

 It hath been shewed by us at large in the former Book, that although the Son of God having made the World, did by his mighty Power and divine Providence, retain, as it were, in his own hands, the general Rule and Government of it: yet for a more visible benefit and comfort to Mankind, he did divide and distribute the same into divers Countries, Principalities, and Kingdoms: and ordaining civil Magistracy, did not only appoint Soveraign Princes and Kings as his Deputies and Lieutenants upon Earth, to rule and govern under him, such Countries and Kingdoms as he had allotted unto them; but did likewise tie Mankind by one of the Moral Laws ingraven in their hearts, that they should honour them, serve them, and be obedient unto them. Which particular Commandment was no more abolished by the Incarnation of our Saviour Christ, than were all the rest. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more