Skip to main content

A serious liturgy for a serious time

Next to the Morning and Evening service in our Prayer-Book stands the Litany, or more earnest supplication for averting God's judgments, and procuring his mercy - Archbishop Secker, quoted in Mant's Notes.

Today the UK government has stated that coronavirus "is going to spread in a significant way".  A UK supermarket chain has started to restrict sales of essential food and household items.  The Italian government has introduced a lock down in the north of country.  The virus has now spread to over 30 US states.

It is a time for a "more earnest supplication for averting God's judgements, and procuring his mercy".

It is a time when the Litany should be heard in Anglican cathedrals and parish churches.

As Sparrow notes, the Litany is rooted in the traditional Christian approach to prayer "for the averting of God's wrath in publick calamities".  It gives fulsome expression to our dependence on God's mercy, grace, and providence, for our eternal salvation, for our common life, for our deliverance in body and soul.  In a time of anxiety and fear in the face of a virus that has spread across the globe, forcibly reminding us of our frailty and mortality, of the weaknesses and injustices in the ordering of our common life, the Litany is a means of gathering up all of our needs before the God "that despisest not  the sighing of a contrite heart, nor the desire of such as be sorrowful".

The fact, however, that the Litany is to be heard in very few Anglican churches during this time, and that very few (if any) dioceses are invoking the traditional rubric that the Litany is to be prayed "at other times when it shall be commanded by the Ordinary", are disturbing reminders that we have largely lost the ancient wisdom that such general supplication is how the Church should respond to calamity.  In its absence, we are left with short prayers - such as that offered by the Church of England website - which hardly reflect the seriousness of the threat posed by the virus and the need for sustained prayer.

The significance of the Litany's inclusion within the Book of Common Prayer is that it provides a means of such sustained prayer and general supplication precisely as common prayer: not dependent on the insights of an individual cleric, or the resources of a diocese, or the wisdom of whoever is responsible for constructing a temporary liturgy in response to the crisis.  Instead, the Litany is there as common prayer - for parish and cathedral, for diocese and national church - gathering up in prayer our anxieties and fears, our needs in body and soul.  And explicitly praying that we would be delivered "from plague".

Unless, that is, one is using the contemporary versions of the Litany in Common Worship or the Anglican Church of Canada's Book of Alternative Services.  The equivalent petition in the Common Worship Litany retains prayer for deliverance from "famine and disaster" but omits the reference to plague.  The BAS Litany petitions for deliverance "From earthquake and tempest; from drought, fire, and flood" but again has no reference to plague .  There is a sense of both litanies here reflecting the 'end of history' culture, in which a widespread threat posed by a virus was regarded as having been overcome by Progress.

By contrast, the Litany in both TEC 1979 and Ireland 2004 retained the 1662 reference:

From lightning and tempest; from earthquake, fire, and flood; from plague, pestilence, and famine, Good Lord, deliver us - TEC 1979;

From fire, storm and flood, from disease, pestilence and want, from war and murder, and from dying unprepared, 
Save us, good Lord - Ireland 2004.

By retaining 1662's reference these litanies have a resonance in the current crisis absent from the Common Worship and BAS versions, precisely because they stand - on this point - in continuity with 1662's recognition of our frailty and mortality in the face of the threat of 'common sickness'.  While most contemporary litanies fall short of 1662's expressions of penitence, and penitence is indeed called for at this time, nevertheless, we need cathedrals and parishes to be praying the Litany in any of these authorised forms.  We need a general supplication to be offered.

This is a time when we need to be renewed in our dependence upon God's mercy and grace, petitioning for deliverance, seeking blessing upon our common life, beseeching "mercy upon all men", acknowledging how the disordering of our common life requires repentance.  It is not a time for cut-and-paste liturgical resources hesitant about expressing the extent of our need for God's mercy and provision. A serious time needs a serious liturgy and that liturgy is the Litany. 

Comments

  1. The BCP (2019) of the Anglican Church in North America preserves the wording as well:

    From lightning and tempest; from earthquake, fire, and flood; from plague, pestilence, and famine,
    Good Lord, deliver us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Todd, many thanks for your comment. It is good to hear that the ACNA BCP retains the 1662 form. We do need such prayer at this time.

      Stay safe,
      Brian.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...