Skip to main content

The Latitudinarian failure

In his 1816 Bampton Lectures, John Hume Spry - linked to the Hackney Phalanx, rector of Marylebone, and described by Peter Nockles as "very 'high and dry'" - summarised the history of the Church of England in the 18th century as the consistent defeat of Latitudinarianism. 

He begins with the comprehension proposals of 1689, defeated by the "vigilant opposition of the great majority of the clergy" in the Lower House of Convocation.  This was followed by the "long protracted struggle" of the Bangorian Controversy (beginning in 1716), which, in the Letters of Law, gave to the Church of England "the most powerful defence of her apostolic constitution".  He concludes with the attempt of the 1772 Feathers Tavern Petition to abolish clerical subscription to the Articles of Religion:

With similar unwillingness to commemorate the failings of those who are now called to their account, would I pass over the ill advised petitions against subscription to the Thirty-nine Articles, which the wisdom of the legislature rejected in the latter part of the last century. Feelings of affection for our excellent Church, and of godly jealousy for the collective character of her ministers, will ever oblige us to lament, that even a few of her clergy should have been then found, so far forgetful of their duty to her and to themselves, as publicly to express an anxiety to be relieved from the obligations, which they had voluntarily contracted to maintain her doctrines.

As J.C.D. Clark notes, the petition was very much a minority affair, attracting the signatures of "only some two hundred out of twelve thousand clergy".  The House of Commons rejected it in 1772 by an overwhelming margin, 217 to 71. When it was brought before the Commons again in 1774, there was so little support that a division did not take place. Clark concludes:

The rejection of the petition, and the exodus of the tiny band of its articulate proponents, was decisive: the late Georgian Church, despite the presence within it of a few men like Bishops Law, Watson and Shipley, was increasingly committed to ... theological orthodoxy.

The significance of Spry's account is seen when it is contrasted with the view of 18th century Anglicanism routinely propagated only a few decades later by the Tractarians.  In 1841 Newman referred to "the last miserable century", a view which increasingly became the settled interpretation promoted by the unholy alliance of Ritualists, evangelicals such as J.C. Ryle, and Whig historians.  By contrast, Spry evokes an understanding of 18th century Anglicanism which has been confirmed in more recent historical research, of an Establishment robust in theological, pastoral, and liturgical terms, with deep wells of popular allegiance.  It was the failure of Latitudinarianism over the century which ensured, declared Spry in his Bampton Lectures, that "the sanctuary of the Church of England is yet inviolate, her doctrines uncorrupted, her constitution unimpaired". 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...