In love and charity with your neighbours

Reading Theophilus Dorrington's A Familiar Guide to the Right and Profitable Receiving of the Lord's Supper (1695), I was particularly struck by the advice he gives to communicants at the conclusion of the service, after the blessing:

Then rising from your Knees, kindly and courteously salute your fellow Communicants at the parting of the Congregation.

It reflects the coherence of the Prayer Book rite, with the reconciliation effected by our participation in the Lord's Body and Blood expressed in the post-Communion Lord's Prayer, the "good will towards men" of the Gloria, and the blessing's unchanging "The peace of God". In a much more significant and meaningful manner than is evident in the placing of the Peace in contemporary Eucharistic rites, this speaks of the consequences of our sharing in the Eucharist, as Rowan Williams has described:

I've often preached - like other, I'm sure - on how, when we have come back to our places after taking Communion, we ought to look at our next-door neighbours with awe and amazement. The person next to me - whom I may love deeply, many not know at all, may dislike, even fear - is God's special, honoured guest, praying Christ's prayer, living from Christ's life.

Dorrington's words, however, wonderfully capture how this recognition calls not for displays of enthusiasm, but for ordinary exchanges shaped by kindness and courtesy. Grace does not destroy nature. Just as the Apostle's exhortation "let the peace of God rule in your hearts" finds expression in the normal, ordinary duties and obligations of the Roman household (Colossians 3:15ff), so our sharing in the Holy Sacrament is to find expression in kind and courteous relationships in the parish.

It is a reminder how those greetings at the church door after the liturgy, the quick chat in the church car park or conversation over coffee in the parish hall, encapsulate how it is in ordinary relationships and duties - not the weird, or the enthusiastic - that we live out the grace and forgiveness bestowed in the Supper of the Lord, "in love and charity with your neighbours".

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog