Skip to main content

'The same moderation': the Apostles were not 'Weird'

The spiritual temper that characterised many Orthodox as well as latitudinarian churchmen has been called 'Tillotsonian' ... A better epithet ... might be that of 'Warbutonian' - Peter Nockles, The Oxford Movement in Context, p.185.

Despite the caution shown by Nockles, it does seem appropriate to describe a significant stream of late 18th and early 19th century High Church thought as 'Tillotsonian', with 'Warbutonian' standing within this tradition.  Nockles identifies the 1807 Bampton Lectures of High Churchman Thomas Le Mesurier as giving expression to this ethos, with its robust critique of asceticism and enthusiasm.  

This is particularly evident in Le Mesurier's description of the Apostles, challenging both Roman Catholic and Evangelical accounts of piety which emphasised 'the Weird', the former with its focus on "excess of mortification and severity of penance", the latter with its "peculiar opinions" and "turbulent and ambitious spirit". He instead presents the Apostles as exemplars of "the sober Christian":

In them may be traced the same moderation, the same evenness and steadiness both of life and conversation. They were equally free from rashness and from weakness. Their zeal was fervent and pure, and uniformly active, but never broke out into excess or violence of any sort. They lived with other men, and like other men; nay, at times in houses which they hired: sometimes they were maintained by the disciples, at other times they provided for themselves; as was best suited to circumstances and as might best promote or advance the gospel which they preached. They fasted indeed, but only as others fasted, as was common, and as has always been common, more especially in eastern countries. If they journeyed often, if they were often in perils and dangers, it was not that they desired these things, but that they necessarily met with them in the course of their mission. As to scourgings and imprisonments, they not only did not inflict then upon themselves, but they complained of them and would have avoided them when inflicted by others. In some cases they actually did escape them by their own act: in others the hand of God miraculously interposed for their deliverance. Above all, their humility was real, it was natural and without parade. There was no ostentatious self-abasement, none of that disclaimer of merit which is only calculated to invite praise. They seemed never to think of themselves: yet when called upon by the occasion they readily and naturally spoke of their labours with all the simplicity of truth, without exaggeration or diminution (Sermon VI).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...