Skip to main content

Lammas Day and passing our time

It is Lammas Day, the first day of August.

Here in Jeremy Taylor country we can see the beginnings of harvest. Bales abound in the fields, farmers are working late into the evening, the crops of mid-Summer have been gathered in. Lammas falls almost mid-way between Rogationtide and Harvest Thanksgiving. Our prayers for a good harvest were offered in the earliest days of Summer. After Summer has ended and we enter into Autumn, we will give thanks for the harvest. Now, in these last days of High Summer, we see the crops that have grown being gathered, the fields change in colour and texture. 

Lammas marks the passing of the agricultural year, preparing us for Harvest Thanksgiving.

And so Lammas Day also marks the passage of Summer. Soon I will again be reading the words of Wendell Berry:

It is mid August.

The year is changing.  The summer's young

are grown and strong in flight.  Soon now

it will be fall.  The frost will come.

Before the month's end, berries will abound in the hedgerows. As the month closes, sunset will be before 8:30pm, more than an hour and a half earlier than on Midsummer's Day. It will begin to be cooler in the mornings and evenings. With Lammas comes the final weeks of Summer.

Lammas Day tells us that the glories of Summer will soon be giving way to the richness of Autumn.

Lammas Day falls this year in the week of the Eighth Sunday after Trinity. The last Sunday in August will be the Twelfth after Trinity. It will be almost half way through the long season of Trinitytide, which draws to a close with the 25th Sunday after Trinity on 26th November. 

With Lammas, the passage of Trinitytide is also marked.

The words of the Second Collect at Evening Prayer can have an added resonance today:

may pass our time in rest and quietness.

May such be our prayer for the approach of harvest; for these final weeks of Summer; and as we prepare to enter into the latter half of Trinitytide. 

(The painting is George Cole, 'Harvest Rest', 1865.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...