Skip to main content

'These volumes shall one day be produced': Archbishop Tillotson on the Certainty of a Future Judgement

Continuing with this Advent series of extracts from sermons on the Last Things by divines of the 18th century Church of England, we return to Archbishop Tillotson's sermon 'Of the Certainty of a Future Judgment'. 

Having established "the truth and certainty" of the Last Judgement, Tillotson expounds how this should lead us - in the words of the Advent collect - to 'cast away the works of darkness', rather than pass days, years, and months "in the gross neglect of God and religion, and of [our] immortal souls":

Thus you see the truth and certainty of a future judgment confirmed, from the acknowledgments of men's natural hopes and fears, from the natural notions which men have concerning God and his providence, and from plain revelation of Scripture.

All that I shall do farther at present, shall be to make some reflections upon what hath been delivered, concerning the certainty of a future general judgment ... If there be such a day certainly a-coming, it may justly be matter of wonder and astonishment to us, to see the general impiety and stupidity of men, how wicked they are, and how careless of their lives and actions, and how insensible of that "great and terrible day of the Lord," which is coming upon all flesh, and, for any thing we know to the contrary, maybe very near us, and even at the door. How securely do the greatest part of men pass away their time, some in worldly business, others in worldly pleasures and vanity, and a great many in wickedness and vice! Surely such men have no apprehensions of a future judgment: surely they do not believe that there will be any memorial of their actions in strict and severe account for all the actions of this life: they do not think that there is a just and powerful Being above them, who now observes everything that they do, and will one day judge them for it; that there is a pen always writing, and making a faithful record of all the passages of their lives; and that these volumes shall one day be produced and opened, "and men shall be judged out of the things that are written in them;" and all our thoughts, words, and actions, shall pass under a most severe trial and examination!

Or, if men do believe these things, they stifle and suppress this belief, and "detain this great truth of God in unrighteousness;" they do not attend to it, and consider it, that it may have its due awe and influence upon their lives. For it is not imaginable, that if men were possessed with a firm belief and persuasion of this "great and terrible day of the Lord," they should be so careless and secure, as we see they are, and have so little regard to what they do; that they should pass whole days, and weeks, and years, in the gross neglect of God and religion, and of their immortal souls.

(The photograph is of Canterbury Cathedral. Tillotson was Dean of Canterbury 1672-91.)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more