'In no form extant, so fully as this': the Prayer of Humble Access in the Prayer Book Holy Communion

In his A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Book of Common Prayer, Volume II (1801), John Shepherd strangely appears to have little to say about one of the glories of the Prayer Book Holy Communion, the Prayer of Humble Access. Indeed, the short paragraph below is the sum of his thoughts:

This address, the priest kneeling down at the Lord's table, offers up in the name of all them that shall receive the Communion. In ancient Liturgies we meet with prayers resembling this. Thus in the Liturgy ascribed to James, "We come to this divine mystery, unworthy indeed, but relying on thy goodness." And again, "we trust not in our own righteousness, but in thy mercy." But in no form extant, can the humble and devout Christian so fully, as in this, express his sense of his own unworthiness, and pray the gracious Father of all mankind, to have compassion upon his infirmities, to relieve his necessities, and to fulfil his desires.

It is a short but yet significant paragraph. Again we see Shepherd - over three decades before the Oxford Movement - rejoice in the patristic roots of the Prayer Book Communion. Invoking the Liturgy of St. James also demonstrates his knowledge of that text. This also points to the conviction - long expounded by Church of England divines - that the Prayer Book's Reformed understanding of the gift of the Lord's Body and Blood was the same as that in patristic writers and liturgies.

When Shepherd goes on to say that "in no form extant" can the Christian approach the Lord's Table "so fully" desiring mercy and the gift of the Sacrament as in the Prayer of Humble Access, it demonstrates the reverence for the Church of England's native liturgy and piety which was a distinguishing characteristic of 18th century Anglicanism. This contrasts sharply with how later 19th century Ritualism and advanced Anglo-catholicism would regard the Prayer Book as defective, requiring it to be supplemented by Roman norms.

It may be a short paragraph but, as we can see, it encapsulates two key aspects of the piety of 18th century Anglicanism, seeing both represented in the Prayer of Humble Access.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog