Skip to main content

S. Matt. 3.2 and Advent Matins

Repent ye; for the Kingdom of heaven is at hand. S. Matt. 3.2.

At Matins in Advent, I use this penitential sentence (found in 1662 and 1926), the proclamation of Saint John the Baptist. The dark December mornings begin with the words of the Forerunner, cutting through the cold, the pressing demands of the approach of the festive season, thoughts too easily distracted by the prospects of busy roads and Christmas-card writing.

The odd, discomforting character of John - "his raiment of camel's hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey" - is what I need alongside the the joyous anticipation of Advent: an incessant reminder from the Judean wilderness that all is not well, with the world, with the Church, with me.

That Our Lord takes for Himself these very words of John (Matthew 4.17) emphasises their significance. That John, he who is "more than a prophet", "among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater" (Matthew 11:9 & 11), said these words, this alone requires the attentiveness of heart, mind, and soul; that they are words also take up by Our Lord, He who is Emmanuel, can leave us in no doubt. 

"To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts."

The distinctive Matthean "kingdom of heaven" is also of significance in Advent. This is not the place to expound the strengths of the proposition of Matthaean priority, but Matins in Advent beginning with words from Saint Matthew invites us to be rooted in that Gospel during this season; rooted in the Gospel which opens with words which particularly resonate in Advent, "The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham".

The words of the Baptist, heard at the outset of Advent Matins, echo across the office. 

They alert us to the Benedictus and call us to more deeply ponder its prophecy of the witness of John:

And thou, Child, shalt be called the Prophet of the Highest : for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways;

To give knowledge of salvation unto his people : for the remission of their sins ...

The words of the Forerunner address us at the beginning of Matins in Advent; in the midst of Matins, we praise the God of Israel for the ministry of the Forerunner; and then, as the office draws to a close, we pray in the words of the great Advent collect that the words of John would move us in heart, mind, and soul:

Almighty God, give us grace that we may cast away the works of darkness, and put upon us the armour of light, now in the time of this mortal life ...

Using S. Matt. 3.2 as the penitential sentence at Matins during Advent also brings us to be alert to John's presence throughout the season. As we sing 'On Jordan's bank the Baptist's cry'; as the figure of John looms large the Gospel readings of the Sundays of Advent (Advent III and IV in 1662, Advent II and III in Year A of the three year lectionary); as we light the third candle of the Advent wreath. 

Hearing the words of John at the beginning of Matins in Advent draws me to think of the account of Apollos in Acts 18:

And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus. This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord, knowing only the baptism of John

It is a statement of the power of John's witness and proclamation. Indeed, we can go further. The fact that all four gospels embrace the witness and proclamation of John shows that it - he - is necessary if our faith in Christ is to be truly grounded in the Scriptures and the saving purposes of the God of Israel. 

May the words of Saint John the Baptist, not least his proclamation in S. Matt. 3.2, draw us in this season of Advent to have hearts and minds prepared to receive afresh the One whose Nativity brings to us the kingdom of heaven.

(The icon of John is 14th century, from Saint Catherine's Monastery, Sinai.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...