Skip to main content

'During this season of devotion': an Atterbury sermon for Lent 1711

Wherefore, laying aside these shifts and excuses, let us all set ourselves in good earnest to resist all manner of temptations: let us putout all the strength which we naturally have to this purpose, and beg of God super naturally to supply us with what we have not. Especially at this solemn time, set apart to commemorate the great conflict of our Saviour with the tempter in the wilderness, and to prepare and qualify us for such spiritual encounters. Let us lookup to the example of Christ, and remember how victorious he was over those fierce assaults of Satan; and what assurance he hath given us, that they who tread in his steps, and resolutely fight the good fight, shall be alike victorious. And whilst we resist as he did, let us be sure to use the same means of resistance, that he used, fasting and prayer: for there is no kind of temptation, but may, by the joint force of these, be cast out.

To these, therefore, let us fly. These let us lay hold of, bending our knees often in private, during this season of devotion, and applying ourselves to the throne of grace, in those excellent words of the church, which comprehend in short whatever hath in this discourse been more largely delivered.

"O God, who knowest us to beset in the midst of so many and great dangers, that by reason of the frailty of our natures we cannot stand upright; grant to us such strength and protection, as may support us in all dangers, and carry us through all temptations, through Jesus Christ our Lord." 

Francis Atterbury's 1711 Lenten sermon 'Temptations not irresistible', preached at St. James' Chapel, Sermon IV, Volume II, Sermons and discourses on several subjects, by Francis Atterbury (1820).

(The picture is a c.1816 watercolour of Saint James' Chapel.)

Comments

  1. This may not be the appropriate time or place, in this day of self-shriving, examination, penitence and prayer but I wonder whether the the Revd author taks a view on whether the extreme Jacobitism of a figure like Atterbury affects their propriety and legality as a guide to the conscience of loyal Anglicans today?

    As I understand it Atterbury was perjured of his oath to George I and the Protestant succession, established by law and is perhaps best remembered as the titular leader of a conspiracy which intended to insitgate a national rebellion, backed by French troops, against his Sovereign. I also read that he died, still an attainted traitor, in exile.

    What bearing, if any, might this have on how we ought to understand and receive his devotional works?

    If not here then perhaps the Revd author could return to the theme in a later post.

    WHA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. Yes, Atterbury abandon England for the Jacobite court. As the introduction to the collection of his sermons comments, he was an "unhappy" figure. But so, of course, were many figures in church history, in all sorts of ways. I do not think that his unwise political actions should lead to us overlook how he was acknowledged by contemporaries as an effective preacher.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

'Whether the Lutheran Churches have right Ordinations and perfect succession of Bishops': Jeremy Taylor, 'Episcopacy Asserted', and Lutheran orders

Amidst the bitter controversies over episcopacy in the Three Kingdoms during the early 1640s, controversies which had become war in Scotland in 1637 and then in England in 1642, Jeremy Taylor wrote his Laudian defence of episcopal order, The Sacred Order and Offices of Episcopacy Asserted and Maintained . He proposed in this work that the non-episcopal Reformed churches could have had episcopally-ordered clergy: Those good people might have had order from the bishops of England or the Lutheran churches, if at least they thought our churches catholic and Christian. Leaving aside the reality that, for example, French Protestants would have been placed in an invidious political position if they had done as Taylor proposed, it is the reference to "the Lutheran churches" which is significant.  To begin with, a large portion of the Lutheran churches - those in the German lands - were governed by a system of superintendency. It is almost inconceivable that Taylor was not aware of th...