Skip to main content

"Not lacking in decency": Eliot and Anglicanism's native piety

Yesterday I referred to Eliot's essay 'Lancelot Andrewes'.  The essay is a celebration of Anglicanism's native piety, made all the more significant by Eliot describing himself in the preface as "anglo-catholic in religion".  Contrasting the literary, devotional and architectural styles of the "English Church" and Roman Catholicism, Eliot admits that Anglicanism has "no building so beautiful as the Cathedral of Modena or the basilica of St Zeno in Verona".  However, he continues:

But there are those for [Wren's] City churches are as precious as any of the four hundred odd churches in Rome ... and for whom St. Paul's, in comparison with St. Peter's, is not lacking in decency.

Those words, "not lacking in decency", bring to mind Roger Scruton's description of the typical Anglican parish church:

The architecture is noble but bare and quiet, without the lofty aspiration of the French Gothic, or the devotional intimacy of an Italian chapel.

St. Paul's is "bare and quiet" when judged by the norms of, for example, Italian piety.  Similarly, Wren's City churches embody a quite different spirituality to, for example, 17th century Spanish churches.  One might think that a writer who identifies as "anglo-catholic in religion" would feel more at home in the churches of Modena or Verona, with their images, tabernacles, and many side altars.  But, no, Eliot is at home in the decency of St Paul's and the City churches, a decency described in the 'Homily for Repairing and Keeping Clean of Churches':

For, like as men are well refreshed and comforted when they find their houses having all things in good order and all corners clean and sweet, so, when God's house, the church, is well adorned with places convenient to sit in, with the pulpit for the preacher, with the Lord's table for the ministration of his Holy Supper, with the font to Christen in, and also is kept clean, comely, and sweetly, the people is the more desirous and the more comforted to resort thither, and to tarry there the whole time appointed to them.

We should not be surprised, then, when Eliot "taking the route you would be likely to take/From the place you would be likely to come from" finds himself "on a winter's afternoon, in a secluded chapel".  It was not All Saints, Margaret Street.  It was not the Shrine of Our Lady of Walsingham. It was not even Westminster Abbey, with its long pre-Reformation history.

At Little Gidding, "prayer has been valid".

But this is the nearest, in place and time,
Now and in England.

This "secluded chapel" was the embodiment of Anglicanism's native piety, fitted for - in Cranmer's words - "only ... those Ceremonies which do Serve to a decent Order and godly Discipline". Little Gidding was "noble but bare and quiet", "not lacking in decency": it could not be mistaken for an expression of Counter-Reformation piety. And its associations with "a broken king" point to that most dinstinctively Anglican of saints, the Royal Martyr.

It was here that Eliot knew home, "the intersection of the timeless moment", beginning and end.

What we call the beginning is often the end
And to make an end is to make a beginning.
The end is where we start from.

Eliot's celebration of Anglican 'decency' captures the quiet beauty of this native piety and its ability to sustain, renew, and deepen the experiences of prayer, place, and presence.  Perhaps it took a poet with an anglo-catholic sensibility to see this, to see what others take for granted and thus overlook or dismiss.

And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...