Skip to main content

Receive what you are: Chrysostom and Augustine in 1662

A Twitter exchange today led to this article by Schmemann.  Included in the article was a wonderful Chrysostom quote concerning the Eucharist:

He mixed Himself with us and dissolved His body in us so that we may constitute a wholeness, be a body united to the Head.

This, of course, is also a repeated theme in Augustine:

That bread which you can see on the altar, sanctified by the word of God, is the body of Christ. That cup, or rather what the cup contains, sanctified by the word of God, is the blood of Christ. It was by means of these things that the Lord Christ wished to present us with his body and blood, which he shed for our sake for the forgiveness of sins. If you receive them well, you are yourselves what you receive - Sermon 227;

And therefore receive and eat the body of Christ, yes, you that have become members of Christ in the body of Christ
- Sermon 228b;

What you receive is what you yourselves are, thanks to the grace by which you have been redeemed -
Sermon 229a.

This patristic celebration of the unity of the sacramental gift of the Lord's Body in the Eucharist and the Church's identity as the Body of Christ is also a key feature of both post-Communion prayers in the 1662 Holy Communion.  The Prayer of Oblation proclaims:

And here we offer and present unto thee, O Lord, ourselves, our souls and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy, and lively sacrifice unto thee.

The power of this deeply sacrificial language comes from the fact that it refers to "we, who are partakers of this Holy Communion".  We do indeed become what we receive, united to our Head - "a reasonable, holy, and lively sacrifice".

In the Prayer of Thanksgiving, we rejoice in this mystical communion, renewed in the Sacrament:

Almighty and everliving God, we most heartily thank thee, for that thou dost vouchsafe to feed us, who have duly received these holy mysteries, with the spiritual food of the most precious Body and Blood of thy Son our Saviour Jesus Christ ... and that we are very members incorporate in the mystical body of thy Son, which is the blessed company of all faithful people.


What is particularly significant is that this richly patristic theme receives much less prominence in contemporary Anglican Eucharistic rites, rather than being a focus of post-Communion thanksgiving as in 1662. 'Send us out in the power of your Spirit to live and work to your praise and glory' falls very far short as an account of the transformative grace received in the Eucharist, whereas the 1662 post-Communion prayers embody a much deeper and more robust Christological and ecclesiological understanding of what it is to faithfully receive the Sacrament.  Consider the contrast, for example, between 'Send us out ...' and the closing petition of 1662's post-Communion Prayer of Thanksgiving:

And we most humbly beseech thee, O heavenly Father, so to assist us with thy grace, that we may continue in that holy fellowship, and do all such good works as thou hast prepared for us to walk in.

This is a reminder that while contemporary Anglican Eucharistic rites can claim to be more patristic in their shape, it is the content of the 1662 rite (and related rites) that is the more patristic.  Such patristic content is why the 1662 Holy Communion needs to be retained as an ongoing, lived part of the Anglican experience, giving prayerful expression to the teaching of Chrysostom and Augustine on what it is to receive and be the Body of Christ.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...