Skip to main content

How the feast of Saint Thomas prepares us for a Nicene Christmas

The proximity of the feast of Saint Thomas the Apostle to Christmas, while disapproved of and abandoned by most recent liturgical revisions, offers a profound preparation for our celebration of the Lord's Nativity.  It invites us to behold the mystery of the Incarnation and how this mystery is set forth in the Church's Christological confession.  And it does so in harmony with the feast of Saint John the Evangelist, following Christmas just as Saint Thomas' Day precedes Christmas.

The Church's Christological confession has been fundamentally shaped by the Johannine witness.  As the Gospel reading for Saint John the Evangelist's Day declares:

This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true (John 21:24).

What is this testimony?  The Gospel of the feast of Saint Thomas draws us to its heart:

Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God (John 20:28).

Saint Thomas saw - and perhaps touched - the Lord's flesh.  Flesh that grew in the womb of "the Virgin Mary his mother" (the Christmas preface). Humanity that, without ceasing to be fully and truly human, was also fully and truly Lord and God.  In this vivid proclamation of the true humanity and true divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Gospel of Saint Thomas' Day embodies the Church's Nicene Faith:

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, Begotten of his Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, Very God of very God, Begotten, not made, Being of one substance with the Father, By whom all things were made: Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, And was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary, And was made man.

In the days before Christmas this feast affirms the Nicene confession as rooted in Holy Scripture, as the faithful account of the person of Jesus Christ.  It prepares us, then, to receive the Gospel of the Lord's Nativity and to confess the Nicene Faith of He who "as at this time" was born for us. 

Having heard the confession of Saint Thomas on 21st December, we are prepared to grasp the meaning of the proclamation of the Christmas Gospel:

And the Word was made flesh ... and we beheld his glory (John 1:14).

The One whom Saint Thomas beheld after the Resurrection is the One whom we behold at Christmas in the crib, the One of whom we confess on the feast of the Nativity that He is both "God of God" and "made man".  Saint Thomas, in other words, has prepared us to joyfully affirm Nicene Faith before crib, of the One whom the crib holds.

On Saint John the Evangelist's Day, the Epistle echoes the feast of Saint Thomas, continuing to sustain us in Nicene Faith during our Christmas celebrations. As Wheatly notes, it was "chosen upon account of its being an attendant upon the preceding more solemn festival":

That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled of the Word of life (for the life was manifested, and we have seen it ... ).

Just as the feast of Saint Thomas vividly prepares us for the celebration of the "mystery of thy holy Incarnation" (the Litany), so Saint John the Evangelist's Day vividly ('heard, seen, handled') continues to set before us the drama of Nicene Faith.   

To remove Saint Thomas from the closing days of Advent is to lose a dramatic presentation of the Church's Christological confession just as we prepare to enter into Christmastide, a dramatic presentation reinforced after Christmas Day with Saint John the Evangelist's Day.  To again quote Wheatly, it is "a fit preparative to our Lord's Nativity":

For unless we believe with St. Thomas, that the same Jesus, whose birth we immediately afterwards commemorate, is the very Christ, our Lord and our God; neither his Birth, Death, nor Resurrection will avail us anything.

It might, of course, be suggested that very few lay Anglicans indeed would be present for Office or Holy Communion if Saint Thomas was celebrated on 21st December.  This is entirely understandable.  We should not expect different amidst the domestic, commercial, and social obligations which mark these last few days before Christmas Day.  

That said, mindful of Cranmer's insistence that the Daily Office has a particular significance for "especially such as were Ministers in the congregation", and that the Ante-Communion should be said "Upon the Sundays and other Holy-days" even when none of the faithful are present to receive the Sacrament, celebrating Saint Thomas on 21st December prepares presbyters and deacons who are preaching during Christmastide.  It sets before them the fullness of Nicene Faith proclaimed in the confession of Saint Thomas, a means of shaping their preaching of the Incarnation.  In the words of the Homily of the Nativity:

We are evidently taught in the Scriptures, that our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ consisteth of two several natures; if his manhood, being thereby perfect man; and of his Godhood, being thereby perfect God. It is written, 'The Word', that is to say, the second person in Trinity, 'became flesh' ... These be plain places for the proof and declaration of both natures united and knit together in one Christ.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...