'These every man repeats as his own words': the significance of the Psalter in Morning and Evening Prayer

Continuing with extracts from John Shepherd's A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Morning and Evening Prayer of the Church of England (1796), Shepherd here refers to the Psalms as the "Eucharistic" part of Matins and Evensong. It is a description which powerfully communicates the significance of the Psalter in the daily office, both in terms of the sacrifice of praise and - while admittedly not explicitly mentioned by Shepherd - the quality of anamnesis found in many psalms.

Note, too, how Shepherd, following Basil, points to the practice of the corporate saying of the Psalter and the different character this gives to the psalms as scripture in the daily office.

The Daily Service of the church of England may be considered as composed of four parts; of which the Eucharistic, or that which consists of praise and thanksgiving, occupies the second place. The reason of this distribution is, that we are not properly qualified to praise God, till we have obtained remission of our past sins; and previous to our addressing God for new blessings and benefits, it is highly proper, that we should render him thanks for those that we have already received at his hands.

This order of the service is not only agreeable to reason and the nature of things, but conformable to the practice of the primitive church, for St. Basil informs us, that "after confession they rose up and proceeded to Psalmody." If we have duly performed the preceding parts of the service, we shall be disposed to recite David's Psalms with David's spirit. This frame of spirit, as Basil observes, is more peculiarly necessary in the use of the psalms. For the other parts of Scripture are read to us, but these every man repeats as his own words.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog