Skip to main content

The Burkean wisdom of the Preface to the 1878 Irish Prayer Book

The very finest words in the Church of Ireland's modest Prayer Book revision of 1878 are to be found in the closing paragraph of the Preface:

And now, if some shall complain that these changes are not enough, and that we should have taken this opportunity of making this Book as perfect in all respects as they think it might be made, or if others shall say that these changes have been unnecessary or excessive, and that what was already excellent has been impaired by doing that which, in their opinion, might well have been left undone, let them, on the one side and the other, consider that men's judgements of perfection are very various, and that what is imperfect, with peace, is often better than what is otherwise more excellent, without it.

I first encountered these words as a precocious teenager, sitting in the parish church before Sunday Morning Prayer, and browsing through the Prayer Book, bought as a Confirmation present and carried with me each Sunday, as was then normal with most attending divine service. Over the years, I have continually returned to these words, regarding them as an excellent expression of an important aspect of the Church of Ireland ethos, resonating far outside the pew in the parish church. I recall reading them during the debates surrounding the 1998 Belfast Agreement and again amidst the consequences of the 2016 Brexit Referendum. More than once they have come to mind during Anglicanism's tortured debates over human sexuality. These words have also acted as a call to penitence in my own life, when confronted with my pride and arrogance.

As a slight digression, by the way, this might suggest something of what has been lost by not having the Prayer Book as a personal possession, now replaced with pew copies or - more usually - service sheets. Not having our own Prayer Book to peruse and mull over, whether in the parish church before the service, or throughout the week, means that the opportunity to encounter less well known parts of the BCP are lost. If this makes it sound like I am engaging in mid-life nostalgia, perhaps I can somewhat redeem myself by noting that all is not entirely lost. It is good that BCP 2004 - sitting in the pews in most parish churches - includes the 1878 and other Prefaces, ensuring that they remain a living part of the Prayer Book tradition in the Church of Ireland.

To return to the closing paragraph of the 1878 Preface, however, there is very much a Burkean quality to these words, prizing prudence and moderation over purity and ideological triumph. We might suggest that these words were, perhaps, directly influenced by Burke. In a 1772 speech to the Westminster House of Commons, on an ecclesiastical matter, Burke stated:

The spirit of religious controversy has slackened by the nature of things: by act you may revive it. I will not enter into the question, how much truth is preferable to peace. Perhaps truth may be far better. But as we have scarcely ever the same certainty in the one that we have in the other, I would, unless the truth were evident indeed, hold fast to peace, which has in her company charity, the highest of the virtues.

The similarities with the words of the closing paragraph of the 1878 Preface are striking and may suggest that the author of the Preface - in the older tradition of scholarly Church of Ireland clergy, and with a certain native pride in Burke - drew directly from this speech. Even if this was not the case, the similarities confirm the deeply Burkean character of these words, a wisdom that speaks to our own troubled, divisive times in churches and polities, drawing us to order our lives, acts, and words towards the One who is "the author of peace and lover of concord".

Comments

  1. One thing I also admire about the Preface is the profound respect it maintains between the Prayer Book and the Articles. One is not pitted against the other, or worse, despised, as is sadly the case in many debates these days. Each is presented as having its harmonious role and place in the life of the Church. Citing the two Homilies, following in the tradition of Article XI, is delightful to me, is a prudent demonstration of their abiding use and further shows the how Articles and Prayer Book interlock.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tim, thank you - and I couldn't agree more! There is a sense of a harmonious consensus between Prayer Book and Articles, with the Homilies invoked to confirm this. While the Preface is now often seen as giving voice to 'low church' Anglicanism, it is, in fact, a quite beautiful expression of an Old High understanding of what it is to be a Reformed Catholic Church.

      Brian.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...