Skip to main content

'The power and efficacy are of God': a 1796 Prayer Book commentary and the Sacrament of Baptism as absolution

As he reviews the doctrine of Absolution in A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Book of Common Prayer, Volume I (1796), John Shepherd notes that "the ancient church" saw Absolution embodied in four practices:

The dispensation of Absolution, as practised in the ancient church, is reducible to these four heads:

1. The Absolution of Baptism, and of the Supper of the Lord, or sacramental Absolution.

2. The Absolution of reconciliation to the church, and re-admission into its communion.

3. The Absolution of word and doctrine, or declaratory Absolution.

4. The Absolution of prayer, or precatory Absolution.

These four heads shape his review, as he addresses each in turn. We begin, then, with the Sacrament of Baptism:

The sacrament of baptism was esteemed by the Fathers the most universal Absolution. To adopt the words of antiquity, it was the grand, the divine indulgence in the Christian church. It was the Absolution, or remission of all those sins, which the party baptized committed before his entry into the mystical body of Christ.

When the ministers baptises, therefore, they are engaged in the ministry of absolution. Indeed, this is, as Shepherd states, "the most universal Absolution". (It is worth noting at this point that this has significance for the Ordinal's statement regarding deacons: "in the absence of the Priest to baptize infants". And, in light of Shepherd's third head, "to preach, if he be admitted thereto by the Bishop". Deacons, therefore, have a share in the ministry of absolution.)

Shepherd continues by highlighting how the minister administering Baptism is not itself absolution - the absolution of Baptism is God's work:

Yet in the sacrament of baptism, the ministry only, is to be accounted human; the power and efficacy are of God. 

This, of course, reflects the doctrinal position at the heart of Shepherd's understanding and routinely heard by 18th century Anglicans from the Book of Common Prayer:

and hath given power, and commandment, to his Ministers, to declare and pronounce to his people, being penitent, the Absolution and Remission of their sins: He pardoneth and absolveth all them that truly repent, and unfeignedly believe his holy Gospel.

Likewise, God has "given power, and commandment, to his Ministers" to administer the Sacrament of Baptism - but it is "He [who] pardoneth and absolveth" in this Sacrament. This, Shepherd goes on to demonstrate, is rooted in Scripture and is reflected in the words of both Augustine and the 13th century Franciscan and scholastic, Alexander of Hales:

St. John the Baptist makes this very distinction. "I baptize with water: He baptizeth with the Holy Ghost" (John 1. 26, 33). Austin has observed, "that to baptize by way of ministry, is one thing, to baptize by way of power is another. The power of baptizing, the Lord has retained to himself, but he has given the ministry to his servants". 

Alexander of Hales, says, "it is a matter of equal power to baptize inwardly, and to absolve from mortal sin. It was not proper for God to commit to man the power of baptizing inwardly, lest our hope should be placed in man. By parity of reason, it was not proper that he should communicate to man the power of absolving from actual sin". 

The relationship between the minister and the grace of absolution is set forth in the defining act of Absolution, Holy Baptism. The minister baptises with water in the name of the Triune God; it is the Triune God who absolves. As in the other ministries of absolution, "the power ... the Lord has retained to himself".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...