Skip to main content

On the Embertide fasts

... such abstinence which hath been used in this Realm, upon the Frydayes and Saturdayes, the Embring dayes, and other dayes, commonly called Vigils, and in the time commonly called Lent - from an Act of the reign of Edward VI.

"Fasting is serious religion."  So said Quodcumque in an important post last year:

Whether it was the serious fasting of Islam or Pentecostalism I have been challenged by many to examine and experiment with my own practice of fasting, and to encourage others to try it ... If there is to be a renewal of the Catholic stream in Anglicanism perhaps it will begin when we once again practice this ancient discipline.

And it is an ancient discipline enshrined in the classical Anglicanism of the Book of Common Prayer 1662.  At the 1661 Savoy Conference, the Puritans demanded "that there be nothing in the Liturgy which may seem to countenance the observance of Lent as a religious fast".  They utterly failed in their assault on the Lenten fast.  Not only, however, was the Lenten fast explicitly recognised in the BCP 1662, so too were the Ember fasts "at the Four Seasons", also rejected by the Puritans.

While Embertide prayers have a particular focus on those who will be admitted into Holy Orders, the Embertide fasts are not only oriented to this.  Thus, in his A Rationale Upon the Book of Common Prayer, Sparrow states that the practice also reflected the cycle of fasting for the people of Israel and was a means of petitioning God's blessing upon "the several seasons of the year".  Noting that there is no liturgical provision for the Ember Days in the BCP, he continues:

These Fasts are still appointed by the Church of England. For though she hath not reckoned them amongst the Holy daies, because there is no peculiar Office appointed for them, (as there is to all those that are reckoned in the Catalogue of Holy days) yet by custome they have been always kept with Litanies, Prayers and Fasting.

Here, then, we can see one aspect (for another, see here) of the contemporary significance of the Ember Days for an Anglicanism in which the discipline of fasting has been widely lost.  Restoring and renewing the practice of fasting requires - as with most practices in the spiritual life - times and rhythms.  Without set times for prayer, the practice of prayer is too easily lost.  Without set times for the reading of Scripture, the practice of reading Scripture is too easily lost.  And without set times for fasting, the practice of fasting is too easily lost.

Three fasting days, four times a year, at the beginning of each season.  The Ember Days provide a means of restoring the simple but serious practice of fasting as a regular occurence within the Christian life.  As such, they also ensure that we are not unused to the practice of fasting and thus are more open to the call of the Lenten fast.

That the Four Seasons are marked by fasting also brings us to experience the grace of fasting.  The seasons open not with consumption, and grasping, and frenetic activity, but with the practice of fasting, orienting us to discern with gratitude the gifts bestowed in Spring, Summer, Autumn, and Winter, opening us to the Real and the Good.

If we want to renew the practice of fasting within Anglicanism, restoring the Ember Days is a good place to start.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...