Skip to main content

"He took the very local possession of glory": Hooker on the Ascension

When thou hadst overcome the sharpness of death: thou didst open the kingdom of heaven to all believers - from the Te Deum, at Mattins.

In Book V.45 of the Lawes, Hooker reflects on these words from the Te Deum and in doing so provides a superb account of this celebration in the daily office of the salvific significance of the Ascension:

As Christ hath purchased that heavenly kingdom that perfection whereof is glory in the life to come, grace in this life is a preparation thereunto; so the same he hath 'opened' to the word in such sort, that whereas none can possibly without him attain salvation, by him 'all that believe' are saved.  Now whatsoever he did or suffered the end thereof was to open the doors of the kingdom of heaven which our iniquities had shut up.  But because by ascending after that sharpness of death was overcome he took the very local possession of glory, and that to the use of all that are his, even as himself before had witnessed, 'I go to prepare a place for you,' and again, 'whom thou hast given me O Father I will that where I am they be also with me, that my glory which thou hast given me they may behold,' it appeareth that when Christ did ascend he then most liberally opened the kingdom of heaven to the end that with him and by him all believers might reign ... We cannot better interpret the meaning of those words than Pope Leo himself expoundeth them whose speech concerning our Lord's ascension may serve instead of a marginall gloss, 'Christ's exaltation is our promotion, and whether the glory of the head is already gone before thither the hope of the body also is to follow.  For as this day we have not only the possession of paradise assured unto us, but in Christ we have entered the highest of the heavens.'  His opening the kingdom of heaven and his entrance thereinto was not only to his own use but for the benefit of all believers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...