Skip to main content

"A salutary superintendance": a Hackney Phalanx sermon at an episcopal consecration

Throughout 2022 laudable Practice shared extracts from the sermons of Joseph Holden Pott, associated with the Hackney Phalanx. This year, we will turn to sermons from a variety of associates of the Hackney Phalanx, exploring the thinking of this vibrant and influential expression of the Old High tradition.

We begin with sermons by John Lonsdale, who received orders in 1815, becoming Principal of King's College, London in 1839, and consecrated Bishop of Lichfield in 1843, remaining in the see until his death in 1867. That year, of course, was the midway point between the publication of Tract XC and Newman's conversion to Rome. 

The first of Lonsdale's sermons for consideration is that preached at the 1827 episcopal consecration of Hugh Percy, Bishop of Rochester (translated the same year to Carlisle, in which see he died in 1856).

Perhaps what is most striking about the sermon is the modesty of its claims for the episcopal office.  It is thoroughly Hookerian, without any exalted claims for historic succession. In Hooker-like fashion, there is reference to "Apostolical practice" alongside invocation of "natural fitness". What is more, in a phrase which would have been recognised by some continental Lutheran and Reformed churches, Lonsdale describes episcopacy as "a salutary superintendance". Also worthy of note is the complete absence of sacerdotal language.

Such Hookerian modesty regarding Anglican order is also found in another Old High figure, Christopher Bethell (consecrated to the episcopate in 1824, dying as Bishop of Bangor in 1859). It does suggest an important contrast with the Oxford Movement and its exalted claims for episcopacy and succession. Above all, it points to the essentially Hookerian character of the Old High tradition.

And it is upon the very same grounds that we also, at this day, in our ministerial capacity, claim respect and attention for ourselves, as persons duly constituted and accredited, according to the form of a divine ordinance, and of Apostolical practice, to be the agents of Heaven, and "the servants of the most High God, who shew men the way of salvation". It is our demand, as it was St. Paul's, that a "man so account of us as of the ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God" ... We come to you as the heralds of the Universal Sovereign - as conveying a gracious message of mercy and peace from God to his fallen creatures - "as having a ministry of reconciliation committed to us". "We preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord." In his name, we counsel, we exhort, we entreat, we charge you, to give us a favourable reception , and an attentive hearing. In a word, to sum up with St. Paul, "we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us; we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God".

... to the duly authorised ministers of religion belongs a stewardship of a high and peculiar kind. It is their business, not only to apply to their own use, but to dispense to others, "the mysteries of God", the long hidden, but now revealed truths of the Gospel of Christ. To their care and administration is committed a treasure more sacred, and bringing with it (we are bound to add,) a heavier load of responsibility than falls to the lot of other men. And as for the better dispensing of things temporal, it is God's general ordinance that some should be invested with authority over their fellow-creatures; so is it particularly provided, that there should be chief stewards of things spiritual, to exercise a salutary superintendance over their brethren in the ministry; a provision, which, even had Scripture been silent, or the current of ecclesiastical testimony on the subject less unbroken than it is, might have well recommended itself to adoption by its natural fitness, and manifest expediency. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...