Skip to main content

"Essential to the perpetuity of the Christian ministry": did we really need the Tracts?

In yesterday's post I mentioned James Bassnett Mills.  Today, an extract from another of his works, A History of the Christian Priesthood (1835), a traditional High Church defence of the apostolic three-fold order. It suggests how utterly flawed is any notion that Anglicanism needed Tractarianism in order to be reminded of "the real ground on which our authority is built, OUR APOSTOLICAL DESCENT" (Tract I).

It has also been proved, upon scriptural authority, that these Bishops were exclusively invested with the right of ordination; there being not a single passage of Scripture that speaks of ordinations by Presbyters. It follows, therefore, that the office of the Apostolate or Episcopal order is essential to the perpetuity of the Christian ministry. All authority to minister in the Church is derived from Christ, and there are but two ways in which this authority could have been delegated by him to his ministers; either by the continual and visible interposition of Christ in the call and ordination of every individual minister, which would have been contrary to the scheme of God's providence as displayed in his dealings with mankind or by the transmission of that authority through an uninterrupted succession, from those who had primarily received it from Christ himself down to the present time. Hence the original necessity for, and the continuance of the Episcopal order.

Comments

  1. The Jester of Qi19 June 2019 at 14:35

    I'm not sure how the publication of a book that happens to agree with the tracts on a key point somehow obviates the need for the tracts. How widely read were the works of this James Bassnett Mills? Did he represent a general upswell in the Church of England toward recovering the patristic and apostolic heritage?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. laudable Practice20 June 2019 at 15:52

      Joseph, many thanks for your comment. The book was representative of a vibrant, widespread, popular High Church movement in the CofE and wider Anglicanism prior to 1833 and apart from Tractarianism. As Nockles has shown in 'The Oxford Movement in Context', and as JDC Clark has demonstrated in a number of works, this High Church tradition had deep roots amongst both clergy and laity. The point is that the patristic and apostolic heritage did not need to be recovered - it was very much alive (indeed, probably dominant) in Anglicanism in 1833.

      Brian.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more