Skip to main content

The other story of Sunday Mattins

On a Sunday off in early July I visited a friend's parish church. The main service that Sunday was Mattins with hymns and a sermon.  Mattins was according to the Church of Ireland Book of Common Prayer 2004, Order 2: a contemporary rite, albeit identifiably Cranmerian in structure.  A smaller parish, the congregation of approximately 50, led by a small but good parish choir, chanted the psalm. The hymns were appropriate and sung with gusto.  The canticles were reverently said.  The sermon (on the Gospel reading appointed in the three year lectionary, the Parable of the Good Samaritan) was solid, thoughtful, and engaging. Mattins is the main Sunday service in the parish every other Sunday, alternating with Parish Communion.

Reflecting on the experience later that Sunday, it did make me question how laudable Practice has, in the past, encouraged and contributed to a 'we lost Sunday Mattins' narrative.  Here, after all, was a parish, a short drive from my home, which had regular Sunday Mattins, celebrated in a manner which emphasises the strengths of Cranmerian Morning Prayer as a main Sunday liturgy.

I had already been prompted to think along these lines when an associate on Twitter had, in late June, referred to enjoying Sunday Morning Prayer in Christ Church, Georgetown.  As the Christ Church website states of Sunday Morning Prayer celebrated on the second and fourth Sundays:

Using Rite One of the Book of Common Prayer, this most traditional of Sunday liturgies includes a sermon. Musical leadership and choral offerings are provided by the Choir of Christ Church.

Days before I visited my friend's parish, I noticed the Prayer Book Society welcoming a new corporate member, Holy Trinity, Prince Consort Rd, London.  The parish website notes, "On the 2nd and 4th Sunday of the month, the service is Choral Matins".

On the same Sunday that I attended Sunday Mattins in a nearby parish, another Twitter associate was attending it in "the simplicity of Old Wye", a historic Episcopalian church in Maryland.  I commented at the time, "There definitely is a story to be told about places in which the tradition of Sunday Mattins is maintained".

The day following, the Prayer Book Society highlighted a tweet by the Precentor of York Minster: "Choral Matins is our fastest growing service post-pandemic".  Choral Matins is sung in the Quire each Sunday in York Minister at 10am.

July, then, was a month when I began to think more seriously about the other story of Sunday Mattins. A story which, contrary to the assumption that the Parish Communion movement's triumph was complete, suggests that, in a variety of places and contexts, Sunday Mattins has been continued or rediscovered.  This story has significance precisely because we are so often told that Sunday Mattins is a thing of the past, a liturgy which no longer has relevance to Anglicans.  The more we can point to examples of a lively, vibrant tradition (whether old or new) of Sunday Mattins, the more the misleading narrative can be challenged, and the more others can be encouraged to explore this office as a main Sunday liturgy.  

"I believe also that there is still much to be learnt from the Matins and Sermon whereby congregations were nurtured in the Scriptures." So said Michael Ramsey in his famous essay 'The Parish Communion'.  In more places than we might imagine, Ramsey's counsel has been heeded.  Sunday Mattins is not a lost tradition. In cathedrals and much smaller churches, in busy urban parishes and quiet country churches, there are examples of it continuing in the British Isles, the United States and - I assume (and will seek to confirm) - Canada.  To encourage a wider consideration and rediscovery of Sunday Mattins is not a quixotic project.  It is, rather, to point to an ongoing practice and lived tradition within contemporary Anglicanism, and to urge that its riches and wisdom should be more widely experienced.  Such is the importance of telling the other story of Sunday Mattins.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...