Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

'This unhallowed device': the critique of auricular confession in Phillpott's 1839 Charge

In Tract 71  (published in 1836), John Henry Newman addressed "the Mode of Conducting the Controversy with Rome", articulating what he described as "intelligent opposition" to "Romanism". Amongst the "practical grievances" raised by Newman was the requirement of auricular confession: By the Council of Trent, every member of the Church must confess himself to a priest once a year at least. This confession extends to all mortal sins, that is, to all sins which are done deliberately and are of any magnitude. Without this confession, (which of course must be accompanied by hearty sorrow for the things confessed), no one can be partaker of the Holy Communion.  Newman highlighted as particularly objectionable that such auricular confession was required to be understood as "a point of faith": That there is no such impediment sanctioned in Scripture, is plain, yet to believe in it is a point of faith with the Roman Catholic. The practice is gri...

Latest posts

Onward, Christian soldiers: the UK churches and the armed forces after the 'End of History'

'Repentance consists in the abolition of sins': Jeremy Taylor's sermon 'The Invalidity of a Late, or Deathbed Repentance'

'All our sins, negligences, and ignorances': Penitence and the Prayer Book

'Not to put off this great and necessary work': a Tillotson sermon for Lent

'The real meaning of that absolution': Phillpotts on the absolution in the Visitation of the Sick

Ubi scriptum? An Old High declaration of sola scriptura

'A deep sorrow, not a superficial sigh': Jeremy Taylor's sermon 'The Invalidity of a Late, or Deathbed Repentance'

'Like lost sheep': penitence and the Prayer Book

'So simple and plain a religion as ours': a Burnet sermon for the First Sunday in Lent

'Nothing can be more prudent than this reserve': Phillpotts' rejection of auricular confession