Skip to main content

The Wendell Berry Option

From the periodical Plough, a description of the significance of Wendell Berry:

Thus it is that a voice resolutely parochial and mundane has inspired so many readers.

The voice that the culture has needed to hear is "resolutely parochial and mundane". 

It is the parochial which delivers us from the deceitful, unhappy illusion that we are autonomous, disembodied entities, for the parochial roots us in flesh-and-blood communion, in the stability and physicality of place.

It is the mundane which opens us to the life-giving, grace-filled rhythms of day and night, seasons and years, feast and fast, labour and rest, work and prayer, delivering us from the grim, joyless tyranny of homogenized time, dominated by soulless work and entertainment.

Amidst a contemporary Anglicanism in which 'parochial' and 'mundane' are often words of criticism levelled at 'inherited church', we might propose the Wendell Berry Option - a joyful, confident, resonant living out of the parochial and the mundane.

Resolutely parochial and mundane: the Anglicanism of parish and Prayer Book. 

Comments

  1. I appreciate this so much. For us, Anglicanism has been gloriously, refreshingly "parochial and mundane." Instead of the rhetoric at our Southern Baptist seminary (i.e. "The question of missions shouldn't be, "Why should I go?' but 'Why should I stay?'" I can't tell you how many times we heard that), we find the commitment to stability in parish life to be "countercultural," "missional," "radical" (to use the lingo). In one of my favorite Berry poems, he speaks of the "art of being here" and how "by it, I should instruct my wants." The "Wendell Berry Option" applies alike to family farms in Kentucky, city parishes, rural parishes... All of us seeking to live quietly, reverently. Thank you for these thoughts!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amanda many thanks for your comment and the encouragement. I love that final comment: "seeking to live quietly, reverently". A wonderful summary of the vision embodied in the BCP.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

The Prayer Book's theology of eucharistic consecration: Why individual cups should be rejected

The common cup may now be shared. So says the Church of England's most recent Covid-19 guidance , issued on 25th January, repeating the guidance given in December. It is, therefore, a rather odd time to renew the campaign to allow the administration of the Eucharist by means of individual cups : after all, the Covid-19 restrictions are being eased across society, the bishops have judged it appropriate to restore the Chalice to the faithful, and there is now no pressing need to consider alternatives. Unless, of course, this campaign has never really been about public health concerns but, rather, about altering Anglican eucharistic practice and theology .  The Book of Common Prayer 1662 makes clear, explicit provision for what is to happen with "consecrated Elements" remaining after the faithful receive the Sacrament: When all have communicated, the Minister shall return to the Lord's Table, and reverently place upon it what remaineth of the consecrated Elements, coveri...