Skip to main content

"All the benefits of that sacrifice": an 1826 High Church account of the Eucharist

From William Vaux's 1826 Bampton Lectures, The Benefits Annexed to a Participation in the Two Christian Sacraments of Baptism and the Lord's Supper.  Vaux was a High Churchman and a chaplain to Charles Manners-Sutton, Archbishop of Canterbury 1805-28, whose archepiscopate symbolised the ascendancy of the High Church tradition.

In his sixth lecture, Vaux set forth a traditional High Church account of the Eucharist as a 'feast upon a sacrifice', drawing out the significance of this description against "the Hoadleian theory".  It illustrates the vitality and depth of High Church sacramental theology in the late Georgian Church and the decade before the Oxford Movement.

It cannot therefore, as has been contended by Hoadley and his followers, be a sufficient account of the observance, to consider it as a simple memorial, or bare act of commemoration ...

It is therefore of his body, as offered and sacrificed for us upon the cross, that he enjoins us to eat; it is of his blood, as poured out in atonement of transgression, that we are commanded to drink, in the sacrament of the Lord's Supper ... 

We should have little cause to rejoice in the death of our Lord, considered as a mere martyr to truth; though we might in consequence venerate his memory, and feel grateful for such an instance of his disinterested love to us. But viewed in its true light, as the great sacrifice of atonement and peace, a very different foundation for mutual congratulation is laid, and the propriety of commemorating the death of our Lord, as an eucharistic service, becomes at once apparent. And hence too we derive, with clearness and facility, the most important benefits annexed to a participation in the rite. For hence, if the previous reasoning be correct, it inevitably follows, that in the celebration of the Lord's Supper, all the benefits of that sacrifice, of which it is an inseparable appendage, are communicated to the faithful participant.

... it is, in fact, a feast upon the body and blood of Christ, symbolically represented by the bread and wine of the Eucharist, and considered as the sacrifice of atonement, redemption, and peace-offering for the whole race of mankind; communicating to those, who faithfully partake of it, under this idea and in conformity with the injunction of their Lord, remission of sin and all other benefits of his passion ... 

If the sacrament of the Lord's Supper be rightly considered as a feast upon a sacrifice, it will follow, that in it are communicated generally to the participants all the benefits of that sacrifice, of which they become partakers in its due celebration. And the sacrifice of Christ, being a sacrifice of atonement and peace-offering, pardon of sin and reconciliation to God, would seem to be the immediate fruits of a participation in it, the primary and fundamental benefit annexed to the ordinance; while our restoration to the hope of eternal life, and the assurance of the aid of the Holy Spirit to enable us to secure the verification of our hope, would seem to be the necessary consequence of the reconciliation thus effected.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...