Skip to main content

On the thirty-first day of the month, at Evensong

It is ordered, that the same Psalms shall be read the day of the said months [i.e. those months with thirty-one days] which were read the day before
- The Order How the Psalter is Appointed to be Read, 1662.

Of all the disciplines and practices of the classical Prayer Book tradition, I find the most spiritually and emotionally significant to be the monthly reading of the Psalter.  Contemporary Anglican daily office lectionaries - often either reading the Psalter a mere four times a year, or replacing its ordered, monthly reading with thematic Psalms - losing the rich gift of, month by month, having our prayer shaped and sustained by the Psalms of Israel, the Psalms of Jesus Christ, the Psalms of the Church.

As the years go by, the rhythms of the monthly reading of the Psalter become part of our prayer at Mattins and Evensong.

There is the fact that each month begins with the words of Psalm 1, itself offering an description of the richness of the Psalter:

And he shall be like a tree planted by the waterside: that will bring forth his fruit in due season.

As Hooker puts it, the Psalter is "one celestial fountain" (LEP V.37.2).

Then on the fourth day of the month at Evensong there is Psalm 22, the psalm of the Passion, which is read with Psalm 23, uniting our experience of mortality - "Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death" - with the Lord's saving Passion.  In the midst of the month, on the fifteenth day at Evensong, we have the seventy-three long verses of Psalm 78, drawing our story into the story of Israel, of vocation, sin, failure, and exile, but ending as our stories end, with the faithfulness of God.  On the twenty-fourth day of the month at Mattins, we begin to read Psalm 119, rooting us month by month in joyful meditation on the goodness of God's self-revelation, "sweeter than honey unto my mouth".

Then we reach Evensong on the thirtieth day of the month and Psalms 147-150, repeated again on those months with thirty-one days.  As the months pass, whatever the circumstances of our life, we are brought again and again to these psalms of praise.  Our monthly reading of the Psalter ends with the words "praise the Lord". How else could it end, but in praise? For our creation and our redemption.  For grace abounding. And in anticipation of the beatific vision which will be ours at the end, when we will be forever praising. 

Of course, it is not quite correct that the monthly reading of the Psalter ends with "praise the Lord", for other words always follow:

Glory be to the Father, and to the Son: and to the Holy Ghost;
As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be: world without end. Amen.

As Hooker says of this "hymn of glory, our usual conclusion to psalms":

the glory of all things is that wherein their highest perfection doth consist; and the glory of God, that divine excellency, whereby he is eminent above all things, his omnipotent, infinite, and eternal being, which angels and glorified saints do intuitively behold; we on earth apprehend principally by faith ... - V.42.7.

At the conclusion of the Psalms at Evensong on the thirtieth and thirty-first days of the month, this has a particular resonance.  These Psalms are an echo of the praises of the City of God and a foretaste of the beatific vision.  The Gloria Patri recapitulates this.  Now, as another month has passed, as the year moves on, we are reminded of that which "ever shall be: world without end. Amen".

Comments

  1. The 1979 US BCP offers the traditional monthly sequence, and also an ordered 49-day sequence through the entire Psalter (albeit there are small shifts away from the primary goal of comprehensiveness during the major seasons of the year). As a layperson who would follow the 30-day sequence if it were practically and spiritually feasible for me, but uses this 49-day sequence instead, I find it pretty satisfactory. From your remarks here, I gather other authorized prayer books in the Anglican Communion have gone a lot further in watering things down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many thanks for your comment. Let me begin by saying that my praise for the 1662 ordering of Psalter (said in 30/31 days) does not mean that I am legalist about this! Prahing the daily office is the key thing. Regularly praying the Psalter (and a 49 day sequence sounds perfectably acceptable) is central to the office. Yes, other lectionaries in the Anglican Communion have gone much further. The CofI, for example, offers a contemporary lectionary that is - how can I put this charitably? - a complete mess with regards to the Psalter.

      Brian.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...