Skip to main content

Lament and penitence on Holocaust Memorial Day

Many thanks to The Critic for carrying my article for Holocaust Memorial Day, calling for it to be observed by Christians as a day of lament and penitence.  At the heart of the article is the suggestion that A Commination in BCP 1662 (or the alternative penitential liturgies in other versions of the Book of Common Prayer e.g. Ireland 1926) be used by Anglicans on this day as an expression of our penitence.

Holocaust Memorial Day confronts Christians with a shameful history of anti-Semitism, a history that was invoked by the instigators of the Holocaust and which motivated some in Nazi-occuppied territories to collude with this evil. The Church of England’s 2019 report on Christian-Jewish relations, ‘God’s Unfailing Word’, states that Christians over centuries “have used Christian doctrine in order to justify and perpetuate Jewish suffering”. The report continues to say that this “has fostered attitudes of distrust and hostility among Christians towards their Jewish neighbours, in some cases leading to violent attacks, murder and expulsion”. This history “contributed to fostering the passive acquiescence if not positive support of many Christians in actions that led to the Holocaust”.

The long, bitter history of Christian anti-Semitism, and its contribution to the Holocaust, should lead to corporate penitence on Holocaust Memorial Day. There already is a historic liturgy appropriate for this.  The Book of Common Prayer has ‘A Commination’, a robust service normally used on Ash Wednesday but also for use at other times of communal penitence. In recalling sins against our neighbour, it has a particular resonance in light of the history of Christian anti-Semitism: “Cursed is that removeth his neighbour’s land-mark … Cursed is he that smiteth his neighbour secretly”. 

The heart of ‘A Commination’ is reciting Psalm 51 kneeling, a psalm of deep and profound penitence. The fact, of course, that Christianity has inherited this psalm and the entire Psalter from Judaism would be especially resonant on Holocaust Memorial Day. As Christians we would be kneeling in penitence, seeking forgiveness for our tradition’s sins against the Jewish people, in words bequeathed to us by the Jewish tradition.

-----

Also appropriate on this day - and eminently suitable for inclusion in any penitential liturgy - is the very fine collect 'For reconciliation with the Jews' offered by the Prayer Book Society of Canada:

O GOD, who didst choose Israel to be thine inheritance: have mercy upon us and
forgive us for violence and wickedness against our brother Jacob; the arrogance of
our hearts and minds hath deceived us, and shame hath covered our face. Take away
all pride and prejudice in us, and grant that we, together with the people whom thou
didst first make thine own, may attain to the fulness of redemption which thou hast
promised; to the honour and glory of thy most holy Name. Amen. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...