Skip to main content

"To restore them that fall": the Absolution at Morning and Evening Prayer

On this day before Lent, we continue consideration of the Absolution at Morning and Evening Prayer from A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Morning and Evening Prayer of the Church of England (1796), by clergyman John Shepherd. In his commentary on Prayer Book Mattins and Evensong, Shepherd expounds how the Absolution at the morning and evening offices is an exercise in the presbyteral ministry of reconciliation. 

On Shrove Tuesday, Shepherd's words are a reminder there is no need for private absolution (albeit this ministry is available to those who desire it for "quieting of ... conscience, and avoiding of all scruple and doubtfulness"). Those of us who have heard the absolution pronounced at Morning or Evening Prayer on Quinquagesima or the days following, being penitent, have been absolved in preparation for the penitential season. 

The Church of England places the Absolution, or Remission of Sins, immediately after the General Confession. The whole congregation having, agreeably to the directions given in the Exhortation, confessed their sins, with an humble, lowly, penitent, and obedient heart, and remaining depressed under the sense of their iniquities, are in a situation, that peculiarly requires the aid of spiritual consolation.

Now therefore is the proper season, for the ambassador of Christ to exercise,  the ministry," and to pronounce "the word of reconciliation, given and committed" to him. (2 Cor. v.18,19.) The priest therefore stands up, and pronounces to the people pardon and Absolution ...

Upon the authority of Almighty God, who avows himself the pardoner of iniquity, transgression, and sin, (Exod. xxxiv.7.) and who, for the confirmation of our hope, has sworn by himself, that he desireth not the death of a sinner, but rather that he may be converted and live, (Ezek. xxxiii.11) the minister of the Gospel pronounces this Absolution.

The priests, as the messengers of Christ, are commanded to restore them that fall (Gal. vi.1.) to comfort the feeble minded, (1 Thess. v.14.) and, under the similitude of shepherds, are severely threatened, if through their neglect should perish, any of  "the sheep of Christ, whom he bought with his death, and for whom he shed his blood" [from the Ordering of Priests].

That no sinner may despair of mercy, or be discouraged from applying to God for forgiveness, the priest, by virtue of the commission, so often repeated in the Gospel, assures the congregation, that all penitent believers are loosed from the chains of their sins; that their guilt is absolved, and its punishment remitted.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...