'In the posture of worship and adoration': Prayer Book Communion and kneeling to receive the Sacrament

The people are to receive the Communion all meekly kneeling.

When, in his A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Book of Common Prayer, Volume II (1801), John Shepherd addresses the Prayer Book rubric directing that the Sacrament is to be received "meekly kneeling", he immediately draws a parallel between this and the practice of the patristic and Eastern churches:

In the ancient Church the people appear to have more generally received the Communion standing. Yet they "stood with fear and trembling, with silence and downcast eyes." Cyril directs the communicant "to draw near, bowing his body in the posture of worship and adoration." In the modern Greek Church the communicant does not kneel, but inclines his body, and is instructed to exercise at the time this act of faith: "I believe and I acknowledge that thou art Jesus Christ the Son of the living God, who camest into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief."

While it may seem counter-intuitive to justify the Western and Prayer Book practice of kneeling to receive the holy Sacrament by invoking the patristic and Eastern practice of standing, Shepherd rightly identifies a profounder unity in the different practices. Quoting the Mystagogical Catechesis of Cyril of Jerusalem and the great Liturgies of the East, he sees in both practices a shared expression of reverence and adoration when approaching reception of the Sacrament.

Shepherd is here reflecting a well-established approach in Prayer Book commentary. Sparrow's Rationale, for example, points to both Augustine and Cyril in his account of kneeling:

It is to be given to the people kneeling. for a sin it is not to adore when we receive this Sacrament, Aug. in Psal. 98. And the old custome was to receive it after the manner of Adoration, Cyril.

Likewise, Wheatley also pointed to the Eastern practice and quoted Cyril:

and though anciently they stood in the East, yet it was "with fear and trembling, with silence and downcast eyes, bowing themselves in the posture of worship and adoration".

In other words, from Sparrow's commentary of the 1650s, through Wheatley's oft republished work of the 18th century, to Shepherd in 1801, Church of England liturgists consistently understood kneeling to receive the holy Sacrament as sharing in the attitude of adoration encouraged by the patristic and Eastern churches. Such adoration is inherent to - in the words of the Black Rubric - "our humble and grateful acknowledgement of the benefits of Christ" given in the holy Sacrament.

This rich invocation of patristic and Eastern practice and piety leads me once again to note that Shepherd was writing over three decades before the beginning of the Oxford Movement. It not only testifies to a lively eucharist piety significantly predating the Tractarians, it also exemplifies how drinking deeply from patristic wells was not a post-1834 development within Anglicanism.

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog