Skip to main content

Common Prayer after the end of history

As I write this post, the top 7 stories on the BBC News website are about coronavirus.  The lead story quotes Public Health England warning that the UK must prepare for widespread transmission of the of the virus.

To state what should be obvious, the Church in its public worship should be praying about this situation.  Perhaps, then, one should reach for the Church of England's Common Worship Daily Prayer to find an appropriate prayer in the face of the threat posed by such a virus.  But no, no such prayer is to be found in Common Worship.  For those of us in the Church of Ireland, we could reach for our BCP 2004 and turn to the section entitled 'Some Prayers and Thanksgivings'.  Again no such prayer will be found.

The contrast with 1662 (and, in Ireland, 1926) is stark.  Amongst the prayers contained in 1662 for use "upon several occasions" at Morning and Evening Prayer we find the following:

For Rain.  For fair Weather.  In the time of Dearth and Famine.  In the time of War and Tumults.  In the time of any common Plague or Sickness.  

Ireland 1926 offers similar provision to each of these.  Now some of the 1926 provision for other topics are included in BCP 2004.  Omitted, however, are the prayers for rain, for fair weather, in time of dearth or famine, in time of war and tumults ... and in time of common plague or sickness.  It is an unfortunately common characteristic in contemporary Anglican prayer books.  PECUSA BCP 1928 provision of prayers for rain, for fair weather, in time of dearth and famine, and in time of calamity has no equivalent in BCP 1979.  That said, both TEC 1979 and Ireland 2004 at least make the effort to offer some sort of prayers and thanksgivings appropriate for public worship in a range of circumstances, which sets them apart from the derisory offering of 'Other Prayers' to be found in Common Worship Daily Prayer.

The absence of authorised prayers for rain, for fair weather, or in time of common plague or sickness too easily suggests that such matters are somehow irrelevant to the Christian Faith and the Church's witness.  In that sense, they reflect the sickly theologies of the 60s.  The absence of such prayers is the outworking of Honest to God, The Secular City, and The Myth of God Incarnate.  Such theologies offered a desiccated understanding of God, with (at best) a crippling agnosticism regarding God's sovereignty, providence, and purposes.  After all, if, as John Robinson famously declared, "Men can no longer credit the existence ... of a God as a supernatural Person, as religion has always posited", such prayers as those offered by the Prayer Book tradition regarding weather or disease became an embarrassment.

In addition to this theological background, the latest round of Anglican liturgical revision in the 1990s took place in a context shaped the apparent triumph of liberalism.  The Berlin Wall had fallen and history, we were told, had ended.  Democratic capitalism had prevailed, the sunny uplands of peace and prosperity lay before us.  Tony Blair's New Labour captured the spirit of the age with the use of D:Ream's 'Things Can Only Get Better'.  We were in the NICE era, non-inflationary continuous expansion.

The liturgies of the era - and I am particularly thinking of Common Worship and Ireland 2004 - embody the 'end of history' spirit and its liberal optimism.  Things, after all, can only get better.  Prayers for fair weather, for use in time of tumults, in time of common sickness or plague, they referred to a past era not to the peaceful, prosperous world of democratic capitalism and liberal hegemony.

The end of history ended rather quickly.  9/11, Middle East conflicts, economic crash, climate chaos, frequent adverse weather conditions, political turmoil, and a series of outbreaks of infectious diseases.  Not to mention the fact that democratic capitalism and liberal hegemony had already made their peace with profound injustices and inequalities.  Much contemporary Anglican liturgy, however, is stuck in a now past era of comfortable liberal assumptions, assumptions revealed to be vain and self-deluding.  At the same time, the Prayers and Thanksgivings offered by the Prayer Book tradition resonate afresh now that the 'end of history' delusion has passed.

This includes the sense of divine judgement found in the 1662 prayer 'In the time of any common Plague or Sickness' and its equivalent in Ireland 1926.  Coronavirus is exposing the absence of limits in a globalised economy's pursuit of profit, the failure to maintain the "landmarks" (Deuteronomy 19:14) which should order and regulate our common life for our good. It is exposing how inequalities and the failure to secure decent healthcare in societies undermine the common good.  It is exposing the injustices which too often surround the weakness and frailty of old age.  This, then, can be understood as an experience of wrath and judgement.  In the words of the relevant prayer in Ireland 1926: "Sanctify to us, we beseech thee, this thy fatherly correction".

We aneed such prayers in authorised liturgies in order to prevent extemporary and local attempts at such prayer in public worship which often fall short because of an understandable reticence regarding the language of judgement when it proceeds from an individual's own thoughts; or, alternatively, lack due caution and reserve; or which lack the theological confidence to meaningfully address these matters in prayer.   We need such prayers because these matters are a part of the condition of human societies, because we are dependent on rain and fair weather, because we do experience conflict and tumults, and because common illness can afflict us.

It is part of Common Prayer to pray for common conditions and circumstances.  The profound weakness of liturgies from the 'end of history' era is that they reflect both the naive optimism and narrow concerns of a delusional decade.  The Prayer Book tradition thankfully sets before us a deeper wisdom, at once earthy and heavenly, in the face of the challenges, tumults, and fears which routinely afflict our common life.


Comments

  1. I used some of those prayers this morning using my 1662 BCP with MP.
    It is large print (reading issues) and that seems to make them more to the point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many thanks for the comment. This illustrates the importance of having such prayers in a one-volume book.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

'Whether the Lutheran Churches have right Ordinations and perfect succession of Bishops': Jeremy Taylor, 'Episcopacy Asserted', and Lutheran orders

Amidst the bitter controversies over episcopacy in the Three Kingdoms during the early 1640s, controversies which had become war in Scotland in 1637 and then in England in 1642, Jeremy Taylor wrote his Laudian defence of episcopal order, The Sacred Order and Offices of Episcopacy Asserted and Maintained . He proposed in this work that the non-episcopal Reformed churches could have had episcopally-ordered clergy: Those good people might have had order from the bishops of England or the Lutheran churches, if at least they thought our churches catholic and Christian. Leaving aside the reality that, for example, French Protestants would have been placed in an invidious political position if they had done as Taylor proposed, it is the reference to "the Lutheran churches" which is significant.  To begin with, a large portion of the Lutheran churches - those in the German lands - were governed by a system of superintendency. It is almost inconceivable that Taylor was not aware of th...