Skip to main content

"Now that Jesus Christ is crucified in our ears": the week 'before Easter' 2020

Quoted by Mant in his Notes (1820), George Stanhope (Dean of Canterbury, 1704-28) points us to the Gospel readings of the Passion of Our Lord, appointed for each day of the week 'before Easter', as preparation for receiving the holy Sacrament on Easter Day.  This assumes, of course, that they are read and heard at Ante-Communion on the days of Holy Week, a practice which has particular relevance at this time when we are required to fast from the Eucharist.  The readings of the Lord's Passion during the days of this week 'before Easter' 2020 can become a rich form of preparation for us as we await the end of our need to fast from the Sacrament.

It is also another example of how the traditional Prayer Book liturgy for this week before Easter - seemingly impoverished in comparison with the provision of contemporary Holy Week rites - actually has a deep coherence in its unrelenting focus upon the Lord's Cross, thus drawing us more fully to behold "the exceeding great love of our Master and only Saviour Jesus Christ, thus dying for us, and the innumerable benefits which by his precious blood-shedding he hath obtained to us".

This therefore may be a convenient, as it is an obvious occasion for observing the reasonableness of that rubrick in our Liturgy, which contains so general a command of communicating at Easter. For, when indeed can it be more properly done, than at this holy season? When may we expect more plentiful supplies of grace? When do we put ourselves more directly in the way of it, than by thus doing honour to that body and blood, which was broken and shed for us, at the very time, when it was actually broken and shed?

If ever our devotions can be exalted to a pitch, in any degree worthy of those blessed mysteries; sure it must be then, when the repeated contemplation of our Lord's glorious achievements for us has raised our heavy souls, and put them on the wing. If ever our faith in Christ be lively and steadfast; it is then most like to be so, when we celebrate his conquest over death and hell, and take courage, from the rout now given to his enemies and ours. If ever we be touched with deep and tender remorse, and melt into penitential tears, and heartily abhor our faults and follies, and ourselves for them; sure, this will be the effect of reading, hearing, recollecting, our dear Redeemer's sufferings: the bitterness of his bodily pains, the anguish of his soul, and the dreadful punishment inflicted upon sin, in his person. If ever the love of Christ commit a holy violence upon our hearts, “and constrain us to obedience:” when are we so prepared to submit to, and be vanquished by it, as now that Jesus Christ is crucified in our ears, and before our eyes, for a whole week together; and hath thereby so fully possessed us with ideas of his most astonishing kindness and condescension?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...