Skip to main content

The Easter Anthems: a morning salutation of Paschal joy

One particular liturgical offering which I have missed saying and hearing this Easter, because of the Eucharistic fast during the time of Covid-19, has been Cranmer's preface for the Easter octave:

Upon Easter Day, and seven days after. 
BUT chiefly are we bound to praise thee for the glorious Resurrection of thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord: for he is the very Paschal Lamb, which was offered for us, and hath taken away the sin of the world; who by his death hath destroyed death, and by his rising to life again hath restored to us everlasting life. Therefore with Angels, &c.

It is a profoundly rich proclamation of the Easter Gospel.  When I say "Cranmer's preface" it is, of course, his translation of the ancient preface of the Latin West, retained in the Latin BCP 1560:

ET te quidem omni tempore, sed in hoc potissimum die gloriosius prædicare, cum Pascha nostrum immolatus est Christus. Ipse enim est vere Agnus, qui abstulit peccata mundi : qui mortem nostram moriendo destruxit, et vitam resurgendo reparavit.

Here are words of praise with which Christians in the Latin, Augustinian West greeted Easter Day over centuries, given expression by Cranmer in a noble vernacular.

It is not the only such example of traditional Latin texts for Easter Day and its octave translated by Cranmer.  The Prayer Book collect of Easter Day is that provided in the Latin rite:

DEUS, qui per unigenitum tuum æternitatis nobis aditum, devicta morte, reserasti, vota nostra quæ præveniendo aspiras, etiam adjuvando prosequere. 

With the collect of Easter Day and Week, then, we are contemplating the Paschal triumph with words which have shaped Christians of the Latin West over many centuries.

What I have particularly treasured this year, however, has been the Easter Anthems.  Here too Cranmer translated part of the traditional Latin Paschal liturgy, Pascha nostrum immolatus est Christus alleluia, expanding this in 1552, with further expansion by the revisers in 1662.  1552/59 used the anthem in place of the Venite on Easter Day, a practice continued with the fuller anthem in 1662.  The Easter Anthems reveal how the themes of the proper preface for Easter are grounded in the Apostle's proclamation of the Lord's Resurrection: Passover Lamb, sin atoned for, death overcome, life restored.  In other words, while in this Easter octave, during a time of Eucharistic fast, we may not hear the glorious words of the Easter preface, the Easter Anthems draw us into the Paschal joy animating the preface.

As mentioned, 1662 directs that the Easter Anthems replace the Venite on Easter Day.  In Ireland 1926, PECUSA 1928, and Scotland 1929, the Easter Anthems are said throughout Easter Week and on Low Sunday, reflecting the use of the proper preface.  This is an excellent example of intelligent and meaningful revision of 1662, ensuring that the riches of the Easter Anthems shape our praise and prayer at Mattins throughout the octave.  At the same time, however, it avoids the rather artificial practice in many contemporary alternatives of using the Easter Anthems throughout the Easter season, attempting to  unrealistically sustain the high praise and joy of the octave for forty days, and thereby losing the ancient distinctive character of the octave.

In late medieval English practice, the anthem Pascha nostrum immolatus est Christus alleluia was used before Mattins of Easter Day in a ceremony 'retrieving' the reserved Sacrament from a 'sepulchre'.  Needless to say, there is much about this ceremony which is theologically dubious, not the least of which is identifying Christ in the tomb with the sacramental sign of His life-giving presence and then suggesting a localized presence on Easter Day through a procession of the host.  Cranmer's re-working of the anthem demonstrates the concerns of a Reformed Catholicity, ensuring that our celebration of the Resurrection is not focused upon the sacramental sign and a localized presence.  Sparrow and Wheatly both describe the Easter Anthems as a "morning salutation" embodying the proclamation of the first disciples, "Christ is risen".  As Sparrow puts it:

we are directed this day to rejoyce with them for the Rising again of our Lord, and to express our joy in the same words that they then did.

The Easter Anthems, then, are a means of drawing us into the apostolic confession of, and joy in, the Lord's Resurrection.  May their words echo throughout this Octave, renewing us in Easter joy.

Comments

  1. On Easter Monday and Easter Tuesday, I used this form of spiritual communion: http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bcp/1928/AFPB_Spir_Communion.htm

    Interestingly, it calls for not only Collect, Epistle, Gospel (I followed 1662) but Preface and Sanctus (ditto).

    Granted, this is mere homebrew and in a sense totally counter to the spirit of your blog. But as someone who loves both the content and the ancient reciting tone of the Prefaces, I really appreciated the opportunity to incorporate them into my private worship in this time of isolation.

    In PECUSA our Hymnal has a very nice, simple Gregorian setting of Cranmer’s Easter Anthems (Mode 7, with Alleluia antiphon).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Prayer Book Society in the UK has available a similar form of spiritual communion. I would not say it is counter to the spirit of this blog, as BCP 1662 does teach that, where we cannot partake of the Sacrament, we do, through faith, partake of the Lord's Body and Blood. An act of spiritual communion - while (importantly) not necessary for such spiritual communion - can be a means of comfort and assurance for us.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...