"The mediation of these elements": Another example of Lutheran tendencies in the Reformed eucharistic theology of Andrewes

Another example from Andrewes of a 1598 sermon on the Sacraments which holds together Lutheran and Reformed perspectives. Firstly, a more Lutheran emphasis on the significance of the elements which rather contrasts with Calvin's insistence that in the Sacraments the Lord cannot "be affixed to any earthly creatures" (Institutes IV.17.19):

Why doth not the blood of Christ immediately incorporate us into the Church, without the mediation of water in baptism, and drinking of Christ's blood in the Lords Supper?

... He useth this course to shew his power; which appears hereby to be great, in that albeit these elements of water, and bread and wine be weak and beggarly elements, yet by his power he exalts them and makes them effectual means, to incorporate us into his body, and so set us in that estate wherein we may be saved ...

Now the mediation of these elements are no less necessary to preserve and keep us as lively members of the mystical body of Christ than bread and water are to maintain natural life.

This, however, is side by side with the characteristically Reformed use of sign and seal:

Therefore is water used in the Sacrament of our regeneration ... The juice and nourishment that we suck out of the meat digested, is that which nourisheth our life; and therefore the element of wine is used in the Sacrament of our nutrition, that is after we are born anew and washed with water in baptism, to signify our new birth: then we must receive bread and wine in the Lords Supper, to confirm our faith in the body and blood of Christ, whereby we are sealed unto eternal life.

As mentioned on Friday, while the coherence and consistency of this stance may be questioned (although its coherence and consistency surely can be defended), holding such Lutheran and Reformed emphases together - this middle way between Wittenberg and Geneva - has the strength of ensuring that the relationship between sign and thing signified is understood as being 'without confusion, without change, without separation, without division'.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog