"General truths": The modesty of the Athanasian Creed

From an 1816 sermon preached by Richard Laurence (then Regius Professor of Hebrew, later Archbishop of Cashel, 1822-38), at the episcopal visitation in the Diocese of Rochester. Laurence defends the Athanasian Creeds on the grounds of its modesty and moderation, against those critics who portray it "as an attempt to explain in detail, that which is confessedly inexplicable".

He states that this Creed makes no attempt to "explain" the Holy Trinity but is a rejection of erroneous teachings which had sought too precise definitions, as seen with the Sabellians who "anxious perhaps to preserve entire the divine essence ... strangely confused together the divine persons" and the Arians who "separated the substance". The Athanasian Creed, rather than being an exercise in scholastic speculation, consisted "only of the most general counterpositions" as a response to the speculations and definitions of "the Antitrinitarian hypothesis, under various forms and with various modifications":

If therefore we contemplate this Creed in that light in which it ought only to be contemplated, as contrasted with coeval heresies, we shall find in it no attempt to explain topics which are in themselves in explicable, but merely a simple declaration of opinions opposed to others of an obnoxious tendency. It states only leading propositions, so contradistinguished, omitting all investigation of particulars, and substituting general truths for general errors. Taken in this view, it is everywhere plain and unperplexed. It shortly points out what is the truth solely in reference to what is not the truth, or what has been alleged against it. We do not perceive in it any affectation of defining (as some have supposed ) how three distinct Persons subsist in one undivided essence, and of detailing the peculiar modes of their existence, but merely a simple assertion of the fact, as deducible from the sacred Scriptures. The air of explanation, which appears to run through it, applies wholly to the statement of points in which it differs from the adverse Creeds, and not to an exposition of the reasons upon which such points are grounded, or of any collateral speculations connected with them.

Comments

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders. With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter. The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition). Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical). Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition. A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics". Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics. What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition. Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School. Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979. We ...

laudable Practice

Search This Blog