Skip to main content

Moderation in talking and in silence: wisdom from Jeremy Taylor

These and many more evils, and the perpetual unavoidable necessity of sinning by much talking, hath given great advantages to silence, and made it to be esteemed an act of discipline and great religion. St. Romualdus upon the Syrian mountain severely kept a seven years silence; and Thomas Cantipratensis tells of a religious person in a monastery in Brabant that spake not one word in sixteen years. But they are greater examples which Palladius tells of; Ammonaz who lived with three thousand brethren in so great silence as if he were an anachoret; but Theona was silent for thirty years together; and Johannes, surnamed Silentiarius, was silent for forty-seven years. But this morosity and sullenness is so far from being imitable and laudable, that if there were no direct prevarication of any commands expressed or intimated in scripture, yet it must certainly either draw with it, or be itself, an infinite omission of duty; especially in the external glorifications of God, in the institution or advantages of others, in thanksgiving and public offices, and in all the effects and emanations of spiritual mercy. This was to make amends for committing many sins by omitting many duties, and instead of digging out the offending eye, to pluck out both that they might neither see the scandal nor the duty; for fear of seeing what they should not, to shut their eyes against all light ...

Silence therefore is the cover of folly, or the effect of wisdom; but it is also religious; and the greatest mystic rites of any institution are ever the most solemn and the most silent; the words in use are almost made synonymous: "There was silence made in heaven for a while", said St. John, who noted it upon occasion of a great solemnity and mysterious worshippings or revelations to be made there ... I remember it was reported of St. Paul the hermit, scholar of St. Anthony, that having once asked whether Christ or the old prophets were first, he grew so ashamed of his foolish question that he spake not a word for three years following: and Sulpitius, as St. Hierome reports of him, being deceived by the Pelagians spoke some fond things, and repenting of it held his tongue to his dying day ... Though the pious mind is in such actions highly to be regarded, yet I am no way persuaded of the prudence of such a deadness and Libitinarian religion [after Libitina, Roman goddess of funerals] ... so such importune silence was called, and understood to be a degree of stupidity and madness; for so physicians among the signs of that disease in dogs place their not barking; and yet although the excess and unreasonableness of this may be well chastised by such a severe reproof, yet it is certain in silence there is wisdom, and there may be deep religion.

But now although silence is become religious, and is wise, and reverend, and severe, and safe, and quiet as Hippocrates affirms of it, 'without thirst, and trouble, and anguish'; yet it must be 'seasonable', and just, not commenced upon chance or humour, not sullen and ill-natured, not proud and full of fancy, not pertinacious and dead, not mad and uncharitable. He that is silent in a public joy hath no portion in the festivity, or no thankfulness to him that gave the cause of it. And though of all things in the world a prating religion, and much talk in holy things, does most profane the mysteriousness of it, and dismantles its regards, and makes cheap its reverence, and takes off fear and awfulness, and makes it loose and garish, like the laughters of drunkenness, yet even in religion there are seasons to speak; and it was sometimes 'pain and grief' to David to be silent; but yet although tedious and dead silence hath not a just measure of praise and wisdom; yet the worst silence of a religious person is more tolerable and innocent than the usual pratings of the looser and foolish men.

From Taylor's sermon 'The Good and Evil Tongue', Part I, in The Whole Works of Jeremy Taylor, Volume IV.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...