Skip to main content

'They prophesy falsely', for Grace does not destroy Nature

In the third volume of his 1818 collection of sermons - Old Church of England Principles Opposed to "New Light" -  Richard Warner refutes, in Hookerian fashion, excessively radical accounts of Original Sin which denied the place of reason, natural law, and virtue in the ordering of common life, the natural knowledge of God, the moral obligation to obey the Commandments, and the call of the Christian to co-operate with grace.  This Hookerian vision - rooted in the classical affirmation that Grace does not destroy Nature - is in many ways the foundation of the Anglican experience's routine and consistent rejection of sectarianism, and underpins the modesty, caution, and patience of its pastoral approach.

They "prophesy falsely", then, who describe human nature, and every branch and faculty of it, as utterly and entirely corrupted by the transgression of Adam; as an unleavened mass of malignity and sin, incapable of any good thought, amiable feeling, virtuous affection, or worthy deed; thus leading men to believe, that they are altogether without power to co-operate with the Holy Spirit, in the work of their own moral improvement and spiritual advancement; and encouraging them to continue in sin, that grace may abound; and impiously to throw the blame of their turpitude upon their Maker, who, by the change which he produced in man's nature at the fall, rendered him unable to do anything for himself, and, consequently, not chargeable for his sin, and not responsible, even if all his work of piety, virtue, and charity, should remain neglected and unperformed. But, utterly contrary to all this is the language of scripture, and the doctrine of our church. Man was created "in the image of God", the work of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness; and it is therefore impossible, that, by any act of his own, he should utterly destroy this amazing work, and entirely obliterate every trace of that image in which he was created. No, my brethren, he went "far" (as our Church tells us) "from original righteousness" when he fell, but he did not plunge into the dark and bottomless gulf of unmixed sin; he became "inclined to evil", because his judgment was weakened, his passions acquired strength, and his will was perverted: But he did not entirely lose sight of the knowledge of God; and the natural respect which he yet feels for virtue, and his natural disapprobation of vice, still shew, amidst the ruins of the fall, traces of the grandeur of the original building; features of that image of God, which sin defaced and obscured, but could not "utterly destroy". 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...