Skip to main content

"This day's grateful celebration": A Hackney Phalanx sermon for Holy Thursday

From A Course of Sermons for the Festivals and Fasts of the Church of England (1821) by Joseph Holden Pott - associated with the Hackney Phalanx - an extract from a sermon for this Holy Thursday, Ascension Day, in which the soteriological meaning of the feast is richly celebrated:

I will name but one more particular of that eminent advantage which we have by our blessed Lord's ascension into heaven, and by the prospect of his sure return. We are thus invited to pursue that track which leads from earth to heaven. Let us learn, then, by our Lord's ascension, as the Son of man, to those bright scenes, that our nature has been indeed advanced to heaven, and that even our frail body will not binder our ascending thither, if our minds and hearts shall have gone before, and if we have so been partakers, in some sort, of our blessed Lord's ascension. By such spiritual elevations, and such good desires, the soul aspires to those scenes of bliss as to its own place, and enjoys some happy earnests of a future resurrection to eternal life and endless glory. 

And what now are the lessons to be gathered in conclusion for this day’s grateful celebration? The views of future glory are commended to us by the noblest prospects. We behold a rescued race once, more united and transferred to happier regions, where to scenes of trial, there succeed the never ending days of recompense and joy. How cheering is the prospect; how noble and sublime; how worthy of the high perfections of him who provides thus for his reasonable creatures! Reverse the view, and how base, how sordid, how poor in every rational endowment, does that mind appear, which feels no wish to be numbered with the good, and to have part in their inheritance!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

Pride, progressive sectarianism, and TEC on Facebook

Let me begin this post with an assumption that will be rejected by some readers of laudable Practice , but affirmed by other readers. Observing Pride is an understandable aspect of the public ministry of TEC.  On previous occasions , I have rather robustly called for TEC to be much more aware and respectful of the social conservatism of the Red states and regions in which it ministers. A failure to do so risks TEC declining yet further into the irrelevance of progressive sectarianism.  At the same time, TEC also obviously ministers in deep Blue states and metropolitan areas - and is the only Mainline Protestant tradition in which a majority of its members vote Democrat .* With Pride now an established civic commemoration, particularly in such contexts, there is a case for TEC affirming those aspects of Pride - the dignity of gay men and lesbian women, their contribution to civic life, and their place in the church's life - which cohere with a Christian moral vision. (I will n...