Skip to main content

"The brightest jewel of his crown": an 1809 jubilee sermon on the religious influence of George III

As in the United Kingdom and across the Commonwealth we celebrate the Platinum Jubilee of Her Majesty the Queen, words from an 1809 sermon by Edward Nares - a representative of the Orthodox party (i.e. the Old High mainstream of the pre-1833 Church of England) - to mark the Golden Jubilee of George III. Noting how the British Crown was limited by law and constitution, Nares rejoiced in the religious example and influence of George III.  This is an aspect of the reign of the Elizabeth II that should be given much more serious consideration by Anglicans:

But I have reserved for the last, that trait of his character, which must still give the greatest lustre to his names and will forever shine as the brightest jewel of his crown, I mean, his constant and exemplary discharge of RELIGIOUS duties. I say exemplary, because in this consists the great worth of his character. I must maintain that a King of this country is so limited and restrained by the laws of the Empire, and so impeded often by the perverse opposition of both foreign and domestic foes, that as he can personally do no wrong, so is he not always able to do so much good as he wishes. He bears the sword of justice, and often has to adjust the differences and contentions of adverse and rival parties; "To him belongs not only the dispensation of honours and rewards , but the infliction of ignominies and corrections". He cannot therefore be expected to please everybody at all times.

But there is one way in which a British Sovereign may do good to all. Let him set a good example to his subjects in religion and morals. Let him shew them that neither the splendors of royalty, nor the greatness of majesty can so dazzle his eyes as to make him forget that there is a God who ruleth above, and to whom the prince and the peasant are alike responsible. Let him shew them that in comparison with the hopes of a christian, all the pomps and vanities of this wicked world, rank low in his estimation, and that instead of glorying in his might or in his riches, he glories in nothing so much as in understanding what the will of the Lord is, in obeying his commandments and in keeping a conscience void of offence before God and man ...

Every Lord's-day has been to him so sacred, that no pressure of business, much less any idle attraction of pleasure has ever been able to withdraw him from the duties incumbent on him; and I have it in my own power to testify that whenever any circumstances have found him at a distance from his palace on a Sunday, he has been eager to offer up his prayers in any parish church within his reach.

(The picture of George III's Royal Coat of Arms is from St. Margaret's Church, Felbrigg, Norfolk.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...