Skip to main content

"The greater and the lesser duties of life are almost always perfectly consistent": A Hackney Phalanx sermon for the Second Sunday after Trinity

From A Course of Sermons, for the Lord's Day throughout the Year, Volume II (1817) by Joseph Holden Pott - associated with the Hackney Phalanx - an extract from a sermon for the Second Sunday after Trinity.  The text - "And they all, with one consent, began to make excuse" - was from the Gospel of the day, Luke 14:16-26. Pott here addresses the challenging account of the bereaved son seeking leave to bury his father.  The text does not, he states in characteristic Old High fashion, encourage a "giddy zeal, which tramples upon ordinary ties", but does affirm "the greater obligation" of obedience to the Gospel:

The plea thus offered was a strong one; it was grounded upon natural affection, and was supported by the duty which a child owed to his parent, even in a moment when the sense of filial duty may be thought perhaps to bind most forcibly. Our Lord himself was no stranger to those obligations; he set forth a pattern of a just compliance with them in his own example. But in this, as in other instances, he took occasion to remind men, that there are superior ties; and that God may vindicate his own claim over every other. Compare now this excuse, with those to which the text alludes; with the proving of oxen, or the visiting a new-bought field. The weight inclines much in favour of the plea, which was made by a son, who craved leave to pay respect to the remains of a departed parent. 

But attend to our Redeemer's answer: "Follow me, and let the dead bury their dead". There is no one, surely, who can think that our Redeemer would debar this man from the performance of a natural duty to a parent, without some great and necessary reason. Our Lord could read the heart. He saw perhaps that this excuse, though it were better coloured, was similar to those which are recorded in the parable. There might be other sons at home who were less disposed to embrace the word of life, than this son was; and to them our Lord might leave the funeral office. Or he, who knew all things, and needed not that any should teach him what it was best for them to do, might perhaps perceive the danger which this person would encounter, if he should go back even for that worthy purpose. He might have incurred the loss of everlasting life, by returning at that time to take charge of the dead. By forfeiting the benefit of instruction in this first stage of his conversion, he might have returned to his former habits, or have fallen altogether from the faith. 

But if no more were designed by our Lord in that reply, than merely to demonstrate in one striking instance, that the greater duty was to take place of the less, where both could not be fulfilled; if men were to be taught by this example in all ages, that the steps of faith are not to be kept back, in some cases of superior obligation, by the calls of ordinary duty and affection; the motive and the reason were abundantly sufficient to justify our Lord's reply, and to vindicate its wisdom and propriety. Such cases rarely happen; the greater and the lesser duties of life are almost always perfectly consistent; and the giddy zeal, which tramples upon ordinary ties, will find no support from this example. But where a competition happens, the greater obligation must prevail.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...