Skip to main content

"Beware of the disorderly and innovating spirit": Bishop Mant's 1842 Visitation Charge on conformity and uniformity

Continuing the series of weekly posts from the responses to Tract XC by Old High bishops in the visitation charges of the early 1840s, today we have a penultimate extract from the 1842 visitation charge of Richard Mant, Bishop of Down and Connor, The Laws of the Church: The Churchman's Guard Against Romanism and Puritanism. 

As with the charges of Bagot of Oxford and Phillpotts of Exeter, the point of these extracts is not to focus on the rejection of Tract XC but, rather, on how these charges provide a rich seam of Old High teaching.

In this extract Mant addresses the unauthorised changes to the Prayer Book liturgy made by "modern puritanical ministers", the Church's "less merciful sons". His rebuke of this practice, addressing examples from the Baptism and Burial rites, demonstrates the continued significance of conformity and uniformity for the Old High tradition, even as the disputes occasioned by Tractarians and early Ritualists commenced.  Mindful of the liturgical disorder which would follow, and which now is all-too evident in many corners of Anglicanism, we can discern how the Old High commitment to conformity and uniformity, rather than being a stuffy, reactionary stance, wisely provided for a stability which aided the Church's public witness and pastoral ministry:

let us beware of the disorderly and innovating spirit of those who, disapproving of some sentiment or expression in the Book of Common Prayer, and being unwilling therefore to give it utterance from their lips, mould the phraseology of the Church into a form more agreeable to their own private opinions. Thus the avowed doctrine and unequivocal declarations of our liturgy concerning the regenerating grace of holy baptism have been qualified into a sort of conformity with the scruples of the Church's modern puritanical ministers; and her charitable expression of hope for the departed sinner has been suspended from her burial service, in order that she might be made to speak a language more in harmony with the judicial decision of her less merciful sons. Remarkable examples these of Christian simplicity and truth, and withal of tenderness of conscience, which thus sensitively recoils from the use of unpleasing language; but nevertheless, on admission into the ministry, acquiesces in a profession of assent and consent to the same language, and in a solemn promise to use it, and is still satisfied to retain a position in the ministry on the continued pledge of that assent and consent.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...
25 comments
Read more

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...
19 comments
Read more

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...
2 comments
Read more