Skip to main content

"Duties which God requires you to perform": An early PECUSA Lenten Sermon

In this second Lenten sermon from Cornelius Duffie - rector of Saint Thomas, New York City 1824-27 - we see an excellent example of the Old High understanding that a popular Calvinism undermined the call to serious repentance as a characteristic of the Christian life. This, of course, had roots in Taylor's 'holy living' vision but also reflected the anti-Calvinist concerns of the 'Latitudinarians', as Spellman indicates in his superb study of the 'Latitude-men':

Believing that the fundamental demand made by Christ who those who sought to participate in God's glory was that they should repent, the Latitudinarians could not in good conscience divorce their piety from simple moral obligations.

This points to how the Old High tradition was also heir to an earlier Latitudinarian piety and its rejection of a Calvinism which, in Spellman's words, obscured the scriptural truth that "the point of Christ's redemption was that men might become good before God". This found expression in the Old High emphasis on the necessity of works, of serious repentance, and of character shaped by the virtues, all of which shaped an ordinary, sober, unglamorous but attractive Anglican piety.

My brethren, let us confess that in the case of St. Paul we see nothing of unconditional election, nothing of irresistible grace, nothing of necessary perseverance. He lived, he thought, he acted, as if he believed the saying of his Master, - "The kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force;" and therefore he reposed not in cold indifference, in tame inaction, in false inoperative and feeble hope. And if St. Paul found it necessary, in order to secure his salvation, to watch, to pray, to labour, with such diligence, permit me to bring the question home to you, and to ask, Whether you expect, without similar pains, to make your calling and election sure? Shall I ask you whether you esteem the salvation of your immortal souls of less value than he thought his? Or do you expect to acquire everlasting happiness on easier terms? Sufficient grace is yours, and that duly improved will give you the victory. But if any are, day after day, and year after year, neglecting that, it well behoves them to recollect, that for irresistible impulses they will look in vain; nay, more, that their continued indifference must result in their ruin; for while to him who, employs that grace shall more be given, from him that neglects it shall be taken away, even that which he hath. 

And let us all remember, my brethren, that our everlasting happiness is not a thing of course, nor of necessity. It is offered to our hardy exertion, and to our persevering endeavour; but will not be given to our indolent desire, and our ineffectual wish. "Strait is the gate, and narrow is the way," said our Saviour, "that leadeth unto life; and few there be that find it." And if the fears, the struggles, and the untiring efforts of St. Paul, be allowed to stand as the commentary of our Saviour's words, we may well repeat the declaration, "Strait is the gate, and narrow is the way." Brethren, the righteous scarcely are saved. This is the truth which I would affectionately impress upon your consciences and your hearts. And in this holy season, dedicated by the Church to thoughtful recollection of our danger, to diligent self-examination and prayer, to an investigation of our religious character and hopes; at this holy season, I pray you to reflect whether you are leaving any thing at hazard which it becomes you to secure; whether you are omitting duties which God requires you to perform; whether you are yielding to indulgences which he requires you to renounce. In your own hands, by God's appointment, is your destiny placed; and if you are not faithful to your duty, how awful as well as irreversible must be the result. No personal election, on the part of God, will secure your immortal interest, if you are inattentive to it yourselves. No overpowering influence from on high will fit you for eternal happiness, if you neglect the necessary means of grace. No necessary perseverance will carry you to heaven, unless you continually cherish and maintain that character which will make you welcome there. And if any are not merely living in negligence of their duty, but in opposition and enmity to God, to them I would repeat, "The righteous scarcely are saved;" and let them ponder upon the answer, when I ask, If the righteous scarcely are saved, where shall the ungodly and sinner appear?

Most earnestly do I pray, that from the consideration of the subject before us, we may all be instructed not to trust for everlasting happiness to vain expectations and delusive hopes; but regarding our danger and our duty, we may reflect upon what exertions God and our safety demand; and having placed before you the example of St. Paul, and the energy with which he strove to lay hold on eternal life, I would now, in his own language, "desire that every one of you do show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope unto the end; that ye be not slothful, but followers of them, who, through faith and patience, inherit the promises."

(The painting is George Harvey, 'Nightfall, St. Thomas Church, Broadway, New York', c. 1837.) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...