Skip to main content

'To repeat the Apostles' Creed': the Creed at Matins and Evensong

Having considered John Shepherd's reflections on the canticles at Matins and Evensong in his A Critical and Practical Elucidation of the Morning and Evening Prayer of the Church of England (1796), we now turn to the Apostles' Creed. Many contemporary Anglican versions of the daily office, of course, omit the Creed as unnecessary or perhaps even as a distraction from the purpose of daily prayer. Shepherd robustly demonstrates otherwise, pointing to the Creed as shaping our response to the reading of holy Scripture and providing the basis for our prayers to the Triune God:

That the place in which the Creed stands in our Morning and Evening Prayer, is the most proper that could be chosen, will be evident, if we consider, what precedes, and what follows it.

1. Before it, are the Lessons taken out of the Holy Scriptures. "Faith comes by hearing," and we having heard the word of God, profess our belief of it ... We trust it will profit us, who immediately after hearing it, individually make open profession of our belief.

2. After the Creed follow the Collects and Prayers, and on the days appointed, the Litany. Our belief is the basis of our supplications. "Faith is the fountain of prayer," says Augustine, and "how shall they call on him in whom they have not believed?" asks an inspired apostle. That we may call upon him properly, and effectually, we first declare our belief by reciting the Creed. 

With strict propriety therefore have the compilers of our Liturgy directed us to repeat the Apostles' Creed, after we have heard "God's holy word," and before we proceed "to ask those things that are requisite and necessary, as well as for the body as the soul".

Shepherd's account recalls us to recognise the importance of the Creed at Cranmerian Morning and Evening Prayer, and what is lost by its absence from contemporary versions of the daily office. It sets before us the faith to which the Scriptures call us: not an undefined, vague spirituality, but the deposit of faith, the apostolic tradition, the Trinitarian and Christological confession. And it is this confession which is the ground for our petitions, which draws us to pray to the Father, through the Son, in the communion of the Spirit.

On the basis of Shepherd's explanation, we have good cause to regard the place of the Creed at Matins and Evensong as one of the enduring strengths of the Cranmerian daily office.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...