Skip to main content

'The reading of the Prayers aright': wisdom from Bishop Bull

In a 1708 Visitation Charge to his clergy, Bishop George Bull outlined "the principal parts and branches of the Pastoral office", noting five of these. The list begins as follows: "First, Reading Divine Service, or the Prayers of the Church". Reading divine service is placed ahead of preaching and, indeed, administering the Sacraments. Bull continues:

First, Reading Divine Service, or the Prayers of the Church. This some may think to be a slight and easy matter, that needs not any advice or directions; but they are very much mistaken. For to the reading of the Prayers aright there is need of great care and caution. The Prayers of the Church must be read audibly, distinctly, and reverently ... the Prayers of the Church are to be read with great reverence and devotion, so as to excite and kindle devotion in the congregation. Thus the Prayers of the Church are to be read, if we would keep up the reputation of them, and render them useful to the people.

As laudable Practice discussed in a previous post, 'reading Prayers' was a commonplace term over centuries to describe the role of Anglican clergy in divine service. Bull's counsel to his clergy is another reminder of how the phrase, and the spirituality it embodied, profoundly shaped Anglican piety over centuries. 

Why might those of us who value the Old High tradition seek to retrieve the term?

To 'read the Prayers' is suggestive of the significance of Sunday Matins as a main service - of how it can shape and form a worshipping community over years, alongside a regular administration of the Holy Communion. Confession and absolution, praise and petitions, psalms and scripture lessons: Sunday Matins offers an important means of shaping and sustaining the Christian life, Sunday by Sunday, as the years go by. As such, it also prepares for reception of the holy Sacrament, something missing almost entirely from the ecclesial landscape established by the Parish Communion Movement.

Note that the phrase is 'read the Prayers'. In other words, this is not a reference to Choral Matins or Evensong. This has a contemporary relevance. In many parishes across North Atlantic societies, a choral tradition is no longer possible. What is more, a parochial choral tradition was, in the vast majority of places, a Victorian development. Said Morning Prayer with metrical psalms functioning as hymns was the norm prior to this. To 'read the Prayers' reminds us that a choral tradition - while a joyous gift where it can be exercised and received - is not at all necessary to Matins and Evensong: reading these offices can be the means of sustaining the worshipping life of an Anglican Christian community.

There is also something deeply resonant about the phrase precisely because of its ordinary, prosaic character. To 'read the Prayers' symbolises the ordinary, prosaic ways in which we grow in and live out the Christian faith. It is not dramatic experiences and the claims of Enthusiasm which, for most Christians, define the faith. Rather we grow in faith in ordinary parish churches, surrounded by ordinary parishioners, living out the faith in ordinary lives marked by domestic and communal responsibilities, events, and challenges. To 'read the Prayers' signifies this in a quite moving way: in this quiet, ordinary, undramatic routine we are ministered to by, offer our prayers unto, and are drawn into the praises of the Triune God.

There is, therefore, a continued wisdom in Bishop Bull's counsel to his clergy. 'The reading of the Prayers aright' points to a practical way in which to re-centre Anglican worship post-Parish Communion Movement, in the light of the contemporary difficulties of ensuring the availability of priests, and the realities of smaller worshipping communities. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...