Skip to main content

'As we pray, so we communicate': reading Taylor's 'The Worthy Communicant' in Lent

At the heart of the preparation for the Sacrament urged by Taylor in The Worthy Communicant is the recognition that the Sacrament itself is prayer - and that, therefore, faithful prayer in daily life is necessary if we are to faithfully partake of the Lord's Supper:

The holy sacrament is, in its nature and design, a solemn prayer, and the imitation of the intercession, which our glorious High Priest continually makes for us in heaven; and as it is our ministry, and contains our duty, it is nothing else but the solemnity and great economy of prayer, for the whole, and for every member, and for all and every particular necessity of the church; and all the whole conjugation of offices and union of hearts, and conjunction of ministers, is nothing but the advantages, and solemnity, and sanctification of prayer; and, therefore, in order to do this work in solemnity as we ought, it were very fit that we examine ourselves, how we do it in ordinary and daily offices.

In other words, if there is an absence of prayer in daily life, faithfully partaking of the Sacrament is not possible, for "it is nothing else but the solemnity and great economy of prayer". The place of the Eucharist in the "great economy of prayer" is powerfully set forth by Taylor:

For what Christ did once upon the cross in real sacrifice, that he always does in heaven, by perpetual representment and intercession; what Christ does by his supreme priesthood, that the church doth by her ministerial; what he does in heaven, we do upon earth; what is performed at the right hand of God, is also represented, and, in one manner, exhibited upon the holy table of the Lord: and what is done on altars upon solemn days, is done in our closets in our daily offices; that is, God is invocated, and God is appeased, and God is reconciled, and God gives us blessings and the fruits of Christ's passion in the virtue of the sacrificed Lamb; that is, we, believing and praying, are blessed, and sanctified, and saved, through Jesus Christ. 

The ascended Christ's prayer in heaven; the prayer of the ordained minister at the "holy table of the Lord"; prayer in "our closets in our daily offices" - this is all one, each pleading and relying upon the "blessing and the fruits of Christ's passion". Such an understanding of the Sacrament as prayer is found throughout Taylor's works. In Clerus Domini (1651), he particularly addressed the prayer of the ordained minister in the sacrament:

Now what Christ does alwayes in a proper and most glorious manner, the Ministers of the Gospel also do in theirs: commemorating the Sacrifice upon the Cross, giving thanks, and celebrating a perpetual Eucharist for it, and by declaring the death of Christ, and praying to God in the vertue of it, for all the Members of the Church, and all persons capable; it is in genere orationis a Sacrifice, and an instrument of propitiation, as all holy prayers are in their several proportions ...

What happens in "all holy prayers" is, in a manner, focussed and concentrated in the prayer offered by the minister at the Eucharist, united to, pleading, and offer thanksgiving for the Lord's saving sacrifice.

Likewise, in The Great Exemplar (1649), emphasised the nature of the Sacrament as prayer:

the celebration of the holy sacrament is in itself and its own formality a sacred, solemn, and ritual prayer, in which we invocate God by the merits of Christ ...

The absence of lively prayer in daily life, therefore, necessarily means that we cannot faithfully partake of the heavenly and spiritual food that is offered in the prayer that is the holy Sacrament. To return to The Worthy Communicant:

So that as we pray, so we communicate; if we pray well, we may communicate well, else at no hand. 

This being so, Taylor sets out "two great lines of duty, by which we can well examine ourselves in this particular", that is, in our approach to prayer. Firstly, our prayers must be offered in faith and love:

That our prayers must be the work of our hearts, not of our lips; that is, that we heartily desire what we so carefully pray for ... We pray sometimes, that God may be first and last in all our thoughts; and yet we conceive it no great matter whether he be or no; but we are sure that he is not, but the things of the world do take up the place of God, and yet we hope to be saved for all that, and, consequently, are very indifferent concerning the return of that prayer. 

Secondly, what is offered and desire in prayer must be reflected in daily living:

If you will know how it is with you in the matter of your prayers, examine whether or no the form of your prayer be the rule of your life ... The prayers of a Christian must be like the devotions of the husbandman, 'God speed the plough;' that is, labour and prayer together.

This then leads to Taylor's conclusion regarding how self-examination regarding our prayers prepares us to receive the Sacrament:

He that prays otherwise, must expect the curses and contempt of lukewarmness, and will be infinitely unworthy to come to the holy communion, whither they that come, intend to present their prayers to God in the union of Christ's intercession, which is then solemnly imitated and represented. An indevout prayer can never be joined with Christ's prayers ... There is not, indeed, any greater indication of our worthiness or unworthiness to receive the holy communion, than to examine and understand the state of our daily prayer.

To receive the holy Sacrament in the absence of faithful prayer is to expose ourselves to what the First Exhortation describes as "the great peril of the unworthy receiving thereof". Taylor is here demonstrating how Article 29 should shape sacramental piety. Just as "a lively faith" must necessarily have expression in faithful prayer, so the absence of faithful prayer means that we do not partake of the holy Sacrament with "a lively faith" and so are "in no wise ... partakers of Christ" in the Lord's Supper. 

This indicates how Taylor's understanding of the Sacrament as "the solemnity and great economy of prayer" particularly challenges the approach to the Eucharist defined by the Parish Communion movement. The Sacrament is not primarily to be understood as a fellowship meal: it is prayer - prayer rooted in Christ's saving sacrifice and heavenly intercession, as all prayer must be. This is how we are to approach the holy Mysteries, for "as we pray, so we communicate".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...