Skip to main content

'During this season of devotion': an Atterbury sermon for Lent 1711

Wherefore, laying aside these shifts and excuses, let us all set ourselves in good earnest to resist all manner of temptations: let us putout all the strength which we naturally have to this purpose, and beg of God super naturally to supply us with what we have not. Especially at this solemn time, set apart to commemorate the great conflict of our Saviour with the tempter in the wilderness, and to prepare and qualify us for such spiritual encounters. Let us lookup to the example of Christ, and remember how victorious he was over those fierce assaults of Satan; and what assurance he hath given us, that they who tread in his steps, and resolutely fight the good fight, shall be alike victorious. And whilst we resist as he did, let us be sure to use the same means of resistance, that he used, fasting and prayer: for there is no kind of temptation, but may, by the joint force of these, be cast out.

To these, therefore, let us fly. These let us lay hold of, bending our knees often in private, during this season of devotion, and applying ourselves to the throne of grace, in those excellent words of the church, which comprehend in short whatever hath in this discourse been more largely delivered.

"O God, who knowest us to beset in the midst of so many and great dangers, that by reason of the frailty of our natures we cannot stand upright; grant to us such strength and protection, as may support us in all dangers, and carry us through all temptations, through Jesus Christ our Lord." 

Francis Atterbury's 1711 Lenten sermon 'Temptations not irresistible', preached at St. James' Chapel, Sermon IV, Volume II, Sermons and discourses on several subjects, by Francis Atterbury (1820).

(The picture is a c.1816 watercolour of Saint James' Chapel.)

Comments

  1. This may not be the appropriate time or place, in this day of self-shriving, examination, penitence and prayer but I wonder whether the the Revd author taks a view on whether the extreme Jacobitism of a figure like Atterbury affects their propriety and legality as a guide to the conscience of loyal Anglicans today?

    As I understand it Atterbury was perjured of his oath to George I and the Protestant succession, established by law and is perhaps best remembered as the titular leader of a conspiracy which intended to insitgate a national rebellion, backed by French troops, against his Sovereign. I also read that he died, still an attainted traitor, in exile.

    What bearing, if any, might this have on how we ought to understand and receive his devotional works?

    If not here then perhaps the Revd author could return to the theme in a later post.

    WHA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. Yes, Atterbury abandon England for the Jacobite court. As the introduction to the collection of his sermons comments, he was an "unhappy" figure. But so, of course, were many figures in church history, in all sorts of ways. I do not think that his unwise political actions should lead to us overlook how he was acknowledged by contemporaries as an effective preacher.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...