Skip to main content

'The best constituted Church in the world': Nelson's 'Life of Bull' and the confidence of the Church of England during the long 18th century

In the closing days of December 1660, as the Convention Parliament was about to be dissolved, the Earl of Clarendon - Charles II's Lord Chancellor - declared in the House of Lords that the Church of England was "the best and the best-reformed church in the Christian world". It was a phrase which captured what Eamon Duffy has described as "the new assurance" amongst Episcopalians at the Restoration that the restored Church of England was "primitive Christianity revived".

This confidence and pride in the Church of England resounded across the decades. In 1684, William Beveridge - who had received episcopal orders in 1660 and would be made Bishop of Asaph in 1704 - preached his sermon 'Steadfastness to the Established Church Recommended'. He echoed Clarendon's words as he challenged critics of the Church of England:

if such would but lay aside all prejudices, and impartially consider the constitution of our Church, as it is now reformed, they might clearly see, that as there is nothing defective, so neither is there anything superfluous in it, but that it exactly answers the pattern of the Primitive and Apostolical Church itself, as near as it is possible for a national Church to do it ...

In our readings from Nelson's 1713 Life of Dr. George Bull, we have seen Bull consecrated to the episcopate. As Nelson notes, Bull took his place amongst the Lord's Spiritual at a historic moment, as  Parliament prepared to pass the 1707 Act of Union with Scotland:

The Bishop took his Seat in the House of Lords in a most critical Conjuncture, even that memorable Session, when the Bill for uniting both Kingdoms passed into a Law; and when not a few were in the greatest Apprehensions concerning our Church, and were for considering thence the best Methods of securing it to Posterity, together with the Union. Wherefore upon a Debate in the House, in relation to the said Bill, a certain noble Lord, of a very eminent Character, moved in a Speech, that since the Parliament of Scotland had given a Character of their Church, by extolling the Purity of its Worship, their Lordships should not be behind-hand in giving a Character of the best constituted Church in the World. For, saith he, (turning himself towards the Bench of Bishops) "my Lords, I have been always taught by my Lords the Bishops from my Youth, that the Church of England is the best constituted Church in the World, and most agreeable to the Apostolical Institution". 

We can see the extent to which the understanding of the Church of England set forth by Clarendon in 1660 and echoed by Beveridge in 1684 had taken root amongst the laity. Now Bishop Bull stood in the House of Lords and affirmed this conviction, invoking his status as a scholar of the primitive Church:

Upon which, Bishop Bull, who sat very near his Lordship, apprehending how upon such an Appeal to the Bishops, it was necessary for them to say something, stood up and said; "My Lords, I do second what that noble Lord hath moved, and do think it highly reasonable, that in this Bill a Character should be given of our most excellent Church. For, my Lords, whosoever is skilled in primitive Antiquity, must allow it for a certain and evident Truth, that the Church of England is, in her Doctrine, Discipline, and Worship, most agreeable to the Primitive and Apostolical Institution". 

Amongst those who greeted Bull after his intervention was, appropriately, Beveridge:

The Bishop of St. David's coming out of the House, Bishop Beveridge and another Bishop thanked his Lordship for his excellent Speech.

Bull and Beveridge were, of course, Tories. Crucially, however, such praise for the Church of England was not confined to Tories. The same formula was used by Tillotson, the Whig and 'Latitude Man'. In a sermon on I Corinthians 3.15, he declared:

I do believe in my conscience the Church of England to be the best constituted Church this day in the world ...

To return to a common theme of this blog, taken from the title of William Gibson's 2001 study of the Church of England 1688-1832, the conviction that the Church of England was "the best constituted Church in the world" underpinned the 'unity and accord' it experienced throughout 'the long 18th century'. This confidence provided a central unifying conviction for Church Whigs and Church Tories, for High and Low, for Reformed Conformity and Arminian Conformity. And so Clarendon's words - repeated by Tillotson and Bull alike - echoed across the long century, that the Church of England was "the best and the best-reformed church in the Christian world".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...