Skip to main content

The "high and solemn office" of pronouncing the Absolution

If the priest feels the high and solemn office with which he is invested, the goodness of God in granting pardon to repentant sinners, and the gracious promise of divine assistance to enable us to perform our part of the Christian Covenant, he will, I think, speak the Absolution with a dignity be coming his sacred embassy, tempered however with a humility befitting the frail condition of an earthly messenger even of the Almighty Himself.

From Henry Handley Norris, a leading figure in the Hackney Phalanx, A Manual for the Parish Priest (1815).  Norris is here addressing "reading the service of the Church", referring to Mattins and Evensong. 

The significance of this extract concerning what the BCP terms "The Absolution or Remission of sins" is that it demonstrates the efficacy which the High Church tradition ascribed to the Absolution at Mattins and Evensong, a teaching undermined - if not denied - by the later Tractarian teaching tying ministerial absolution to private confession and the particular form of absolution associated with it. 

By contrast, High Church teaching ensures that the gift and grace of absolution is available not just to a numerically very small spiritual elite of Anglicans who avail of private confession, but to all those who gather for Mattins and Evensong and share in the General Confession "with a pure heart and humble voice".

Comments

  1. I find this absolution odd. The purposeful clause doesn't direct the absolution to the people as 'you' but to 'them that truly repent &c.' Also the verbs are indicative rather than subjunctive, almost suggesting that it's in God's habit to pardon and absolve rather than performing it here and now. Then it goes off into its cohortative Wherefore with the kind of stuff one beseeches before one's absolved. So odd! Or so think I!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gareth, many thanks for your comment and apologies for the delay in publishing it. Needless, I do disagree! The opening of the Absolution rightly grounds the act in the grace and mercy of God. From this flows the act of ministerial absolution. The centre of this Absolution is the proclamation "He pardoneth and absolveth all them that truly repent", with the repetition - "pardoneth and absolveth" - emphasising the gift. Finally, there is the petition for fruits of "true repentance", "that the rest of our life may be pure and holy". This is a quite beautiful enactment of the doctrine of repentance.

      Brian.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I support the ordination of women: a High Church reflection

A number of commenters on this blog have asked about my occasional expressions of support for the ordination of women to all three orders.  With some hesitation, I have decided to post a summary of my own views on this matter.  The hesitation is because I have sought on this blog to focus on issues and themes which can unify those who identify with or have respect (grudging or otherwise!) for what we might term 'classical' Anglicanism (the Anglicanism of the Formularies and - yes - of the Old High Church tradition).  Some oppose the ordination of women (and I have friends and colleagues who do so, Anglo-Catholic, High Church, and Reformed Evangelical).  Some of us support it (again, friends and colleagues covering a wide range of theological traditions). Below, I have organised my thinking around 5 points (needless to say, no reference to Dort is implied). 1. The Declaration for Subscription required of clergy in the Church of Ireland states: (6) I promise to submit ...

How the Old High tradition continued

Charles Gore's 1914 letter to the clergy of his diocese, ' The Basis of Anglican Fellowship ', can be regarded as a classical expression of the Prayer Book Catholic tradition.  A key part of the letter - entitled 'Romanizing in the Church of England' - addressed the "Catholic movement", questioning beliefs and practices within it which tended to "a position which makes it very difficult for its extremer representatives to give an intelligible reason why they are not Roman Catholics".  Gore provides the outlines of an alternative account and experience of catholicity within Anglicanism, defined by three characteristics.  What is particularly interesting about these characteristics is their continuity with the older High Church tradition.  Indeed, the central characteristic as set out by Gore was integral to High Church claims over centuries: To accept the Anglican position as valid, in any sense, is to appeal behind the Pope and the authority of t...

1928 practices and the 1979 book: unthinking conservatism or popular piety?

Those responsible for Earth & Altar - a new blog emanating from a group within TEC - are to be congratulated for an excellent contribution to wider Anglican discussion and debate. The commitment to "an expansively conceived credal orthodoxy as fully compatible with LGBTQ inclusion, gender equality, and racial justice" is an important part of a wider retrieval of creedal orthodoxy within what we might call the post-liberal generation. It is in this spirit that I want to respond to a recent post on the site by Andrew McGowan , Dean of the Berkeley Divinity School at Yale and Professor of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School.  Against the background of another round of "ill-defined" liturgical revision in TEC, he understandably urges that a fuller reception of the 1979 BCP should occur before further reforms. In doing so, however, he takes aim at what he describes as "clinging to the ritual structures of 1928" while using the text of 1979.  We ...